[Mspgcc-users] Re: Bugs in BIS_SR et al

2006-03-22 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-03-22, David Dyck wrote: >> It would be good to add a note to the manual section for >> _BIS_SR_IRQ() and _BIC_SR_IRQ() explaining that they _must_ be >> called from the "top-level" of an ISR. They must be called >> directly by the function which was declared as an interrupt >> handler.

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Re: Bugs in BIS_SR et al

2006-03-22 Thread David Dyck
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 at 13:19 -0800, Grant Edwards wrote: It would be good to add a note to the manual section for _BIS_SR_IRQ() and _BIC_SR_IRQ() explaining that they _must_ be called from the "top-level" of an ISR. They must be called directly by the function which was declared as an interrup

[Mspgcc-users] Re: Bugs in BIS_SR et al

2006-03-22 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2006-03-22, Grant Edwards wrote: It would be good to add a note to the manual section for _BIS_SR_IRQ() and _BIC_SR_IRQ() explaining that they _must_ be called from the "top-level" of an ISR. They must be called directly by the function which was declared as an interrupt handler. The follow