Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430F5659, msp430mcu-20130321, Windows

2013-07-02 Thread Peter Bigot
That's almost certainly not the right correction, but as long as you don't use the ram_mirror section it won't matter. Thanks for following up; I'll add a ticket so if there's another release it gets fixed. Peter On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Thierry Varidel wrote: > I found the problem! >

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430F5659, msp430mcu-20130321, Windows

2013-07-02 Thread Thierry Varidel
I found the problem! There was a typo in the memory.x file at this line : ram_mirror (wx) : ORIGIN = 0xfc000, LENGTH = 0x-f5c00 instead of : ram_mirror (wx) : ORIGIN = 0xfc000, LENGTH = 0xf5c00 Now it compiles with mspgcc 4.7.0! TV 2013/7/2 Peter Bigot > Sorry; I misread that as the

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430F5659, msp430mcu-20130321, Windows

2013-07-02 Thread Peter Bigot
Sorry; I misread that as the FR5969. In short, the only combinations that are supposed to work are the ones that are in mspgcc releases. The 20120406 mspgcc release you're using will probably not work with 20130321 msp430mcu, but the 20120911 mspgcc release probably would except for the risk of d

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430F5659, msp430mcu-20130321, Windows

2013-07-02 Thread Thierry Varidel
Hello Peter, Thank you for answering. I have seen the mailing list entry you mentioned before. In it, you said that the release 20130321 of msp430mcu is not working with FRAM chips but the F5659 is not using FRAM this is why I was thinking that it was feasible to use its headers from 20130321-ms

Re: [Mspgcc-users] MSP430F5659, msp430mcu-20130321, Windows

2013-07-02 Thread Peter Bigot
> Can anybody give me some information on how to achieve that? Not really. In some cases you can mix versions of the component packages of mspgcc and they'll probably work; in this case you can't. See: http://www.mail-archive.com/mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg11556.html In short, the ne