RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Jason Sandys
This is default behavior in 2012. They still need access to the Internet facing MP and WSUS instance, but actual binaries for the updates will come from Microsoft. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald Sent: Tuesday, April

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Brian McDonald
For clarification, I need to have WSUS installed/configured on the internet facing MP? What is this mandatory? Brian From: ja...@sandys.us To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:36:52 + This is

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Jason Sandys
Yes, MPs are mandatory. All ConfigMgr clients must be able to communicate with an MP to retrieve policy and submit inventory, state messages, status messages, etc.. For Internet based clients, this must be an Internet-facing MP. And yes, for software updates, a SUP with an underlying WSUS is

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Brian McDonald
I'm a little confused by this. I have an IBCM MP/DP right now and IBCM clients are working properly. I want my clients while on the internet to go to Microsoft Update (not my internet facing MP/DP/SUP). Are you saying the default behavior is for my internet clients to go to Microsoft Update

RE: [mssms] OSD task sequence - Run Command Line - xcopy pulling entire DP share?

2014-04-15 Thread Trevor Sullivan
Daniel, Right, but if you're referencing the package in that task sequence step anyway, then it makes sense to just wrap it up in a batch file (IMO). It's predictable and straightforward (stealing from Niall's article title). :) Cheers, Trevor Sullivan Microsoft PowerShell MVP From:

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Jason Sandys
Updates don't come from the SUP (or the WSUS instance) in ConfigMgr, they come from the DP (for internal clients). The WSUS instance provides the update catalog (and EULAs), and not updates. For clients on the Internet however, they will get the updates from Microsoft instead of the DP - the

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Brian McDonald
Jason, Much appreciated. One more question around this. What happens if I don't have a WSUS instance and SUP on the internet facing MP? Will my internet clients still go to Microsoft Update? Thanks, Brian From: ja...@sandys.us To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] IBCM clients

RE: [mssms] OSD task sequence - Run Command Line - xcopy pulling entire DP share?

2014-04-15 Thread Daniel Ratliff
But not if I want to make a change during the day. If I have to change the content of a prod package, it's a good 15 minutes to distribute to the DPs, and then another 15-30 to get to all the local peers. If I just have to make a task sequence change, it's just a policy update that has to

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Troy Martin
Before they go to Microsoft to download the update binaries, where would they get the catalog from to scan against? You need an Internet-facing SUP so IBCM clients can still download the catalog. WSUS Catalog = SUP (in DMZ) Binaries = 1st - Microsoft Update, 2nd- DP (in DMZ) Troy L. Martin |

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Brian McDonald
If the clients are going to Microsoft Update, what is the need for the DP as you have mentioned in your email below? I don't want my clients going to the DP (in DMZ) to get updates. Thanks, Brian From: troy.mar...@1e.com To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-15 Thread Jason Sandys
If you are *only* doing software updates, then there would be no need for the DP for the Internet clients - I never said there was. I only mentioned the DP to point out that the SUP and WSUS instance have nothing to do with the updates themselves. J From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

RE: [mssms] One Drive

2014-04-15 Thread Daniel Ratliff
We are. Haven't built our 8.1u1 image yet though, doing that this week. -Daniel Ratliff -Original Message- From: Todd Hemsell [hems...@gmail.commailto:hems...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 08:35 PM Eastern Standard Time To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] One Drive

RE: [mssms] One Drive

2014-04-15 Thread Johns, Damon (DoJ)
I have disabled by default but have the option of enabling via group policy controlled via a security group if required. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff Sent: Wednesday, 16 April 2014 10:37 AM To:

[mssms] Changing Client Center's web client default ports

2014-04-15 Thread elsalvoz
Hello All, Does anyone knows how to change the WS-man ports and have SSL checked by default so when users run it have the correct changes? SCCMCliCtrWPF.exe.config This is the file that contains the settings; however, if this file is changed, I get a hash errors at run-time.

RE: [mssms] Handling Java's requirement to have the browser closed

2014-04-15 Thread David O'Brien
Either script it to just close the browser or better for everyone and really easy to implement, use https://psappdeploytoolkit.codeplex.com/ David From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Corkill, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:42