RE: [mssms] One Drive

2014-04-17 Thread Marcum, John
I'm curious what industry you work in that would allow such? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Glenz Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:53 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] One Drive +1 Ryan. I see that in Health

RE: [mssms] Application Deployment reports

2014-04-17 Thread Beardsley, James
No… still can’t get it to work with user-based. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 8:49 AM To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' Subject: RE: [mssms] Application Deployment reports Any chance you found

[mssms] Re: OSD/MP issues on SCCM 2012 SP1 R2

2014-04-17 Thread elsalvoz
Bump... Anyone? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:51 PM, elsalvoz elsal...@gmail.com wrote: We are experiencing an unique issue on our environment during OSD deployments. When I server has two or more NICs enabled, it can download policy. We started noticing this behavior during OSD bare metal about

[mssms] Supercedence with Avalible appplications targeted at users.

2014-04-17 Thread Matt Wilkinson
Hi I have a custom script that is deployed as an application. Its available on the software catalog to a user collection. I want to supersede this application with a newer version. The sccm client doesn’t seem to enforce the supersedence where the application is already installed. Does anybody

[mssms] Re: Changing Client Center's web client default ports

2014-04-17 Thread elsalvoz
Has anyone tried it? I would think this would come up often from security teams as to use non-default ports for particular applications. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:19 PM, elsalvoz elsal...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, Does anyone knows how to change the WS-man ports and have SSL checked by

RE: [mssms] Re: Changing Client Center's web client default ports

2014-04-17 Thread Daniel Ratliff
I would post this on the codeplex site, Roger is very responsive to requests and questions. http://sccmclictr.codeplex.com/ Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of elsalvoz Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:40 AM To:

RE: [mssms] Supercedence with Avalible appplications targeted at users.

2014-04-17 Thread Schwan, Phil
When you say it’s not enforcing the supersedence, what exactly are you seeing? Did you specify the Deployment Type to replace and tell it to Uninstall? -Phil _ Phil Schwan | Technical Architect, Enterprise Windows Services Project

Re: [mssms] Re: Changing Client Center's web client default ports

2014-04-17 Thread elsalvoz
Thanks Daniel, I made a post this morning in codeplex :) . I was hoping some in the list had done before and share their findings and be an easy change. Thanks, Cesar On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Daniel Ratliff dratl...@humana.com wrote: I would post this on the codeplex site, Roger is

RE: [mssms] SCEP

2014-04-17 Thread Michael Mott
I'm not sure that that makes FEP\SCEP a bad product and the Red Headed step child does it? I remember meeting the product guys at MMS (imagine that) and spent about 30 minutes talking to them. Very receptive, and very helpful people, which may be different than PSS folks on the phone. Seems

[mssms] RE: 2919355 (the spring update) is back on WSUS

2014-04-17 Thread Mote, Todd
Ahhh, thanks, I hadn't actually clicked through to the download for any of them yet. I was expecting it to be a separate line item like Service Packs used to be ala Windows 7 with SP1 for example. From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of

RE: [mssms] SCEP

2014-04-17 Thread Johan van Dijk
Why would you do that...? We only do the daily quick scan on all of our machines. Any other data, if infected, will be catched while it's being touched... -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John Sent:

Re: [mssms] Re: Changing Client Center's web client default ports

2014-04-17 Thread elsalvoz
For anyone else looking to do the same. https://sccmclictr.codeplex.com/discussions/542526 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Daniel Ratliff dratl...@humana.com wrote: I would post this on the codeplex site, Roger is very responsive to requests and questions.

RE: [mssms] SCEP

2014-04-17 Thread Marcum, John
Because we got a virus that there were no definitions for. A couple days later MS released definitions. By that time it had spread across network shares and infected all .exe files on our SAN. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

[mssms] RE: can't see KB2919355 in All Software Updates

2014-04-17 Thread JONES, RICK J
No problems experienced to date. When the update came through it updated the entry and we never saw any problems from it. With the updated version came the new file requirement and so the content we had downloaded went RED X on it, just downloaded the content to the same DP and all good. It

[mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread JONES, RICK J
Has anyone run across a tool or a script of any sort that could be deployed by SCCM to allow a user to self-elevate their rights to Local Administrator and then say, an hour later remove those admin rights? I have all kinds of ideas for it, but hoping that someone has already done this. Rick

Re: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread Ryan
I would strongly advise against it, but if you are set on it I can recommend PowerBroker: http://www.beyondtrust.com/Products/PowerBrokerforWindows/ It elevates programs and leaves the user with their standard rights. It can be horribly abused, but anything that gives a user admin rights can.

RE: [mssms] IBCM clients go to Microsoft Update for patches

2014-04-17 Thread Brian McDonald
Thanks Troy. Is it considered best practice to share the WSUS database in this particular scenario where I have an intranet facing SUP on my Primary and an internet facing SUP in the DMZ? Should there also be a separate internet facing WSUS (e.g. not shared with the WSUS instance I have on my

[mssms] RE: Power management in SCCM 2012

2014-04-17 Thread Miller, Todd
I have submitted a DCR to connect. Feel free to vote for it if you think it would be more intuitive and helpful to have power configurations be assigned as a client settings like all the dozens other like settings rather than attached to collection properties. From:

RE: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread Rod Trent
PSExec and the scheduler service? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of JONES, RICK J Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 5:13 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin Has anyone run across a tool or

RE: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread JONES, RICK J
Elevation of rights has been a battle for as long as I can remember while being here these 14 years, so I surely agree against having them. But… there are exceptions, and situations where a user gets all the authorized approvals from management and such. What I am after is a method to allow the

RE: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread JONES, RICK J
Yea that's a possibility but... would need some wrapping around it. I am not opposed to wrapping around it, I was just hoping someone had already done this. Rick J. Jones Wireless from ATT Domestic Desktop Application Management D: (425) 288-6240 C: (206) 419-1104 From:

RE: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread Daniel Ratliff
+1 for PowerBroker. It's not even elevating to full admin, only allowing rights to the files, folders, processes, etc you need. Keep in mind UAC is required, so if you aren't using it on win7 you can't use PB. -Daniel Ratliff -Original Message- From: JONES, RICK J

[mssms] RE: Power management in SCCM 2012

2014-04-17 Thread Taxter, Latisha
I do.. where do I vote? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 2:35 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] RE: Power management in SCCM 2012 I have submitted a DCR to connect. Feel free to

Re: [mssms] Temporary Elevation to Local Admin

2014-04-17 Thread Ryan
If you are willing to pay for a product, PowerBroker. If not, here is how I'd tackle the problem: 1) Write a script that grants the current user admin rights, creates a scheduled task to remove those admin rights, and then writes something somewhere to signal the script was run. 2) Make a