Yep, this is what I see in my testing also.
I have maint window open from 9PM-11PM, application deployment evaluation
cycle runs at 8pm, it won't reinstall that app until 9PM when the maint
window opens up (which is what I want).
We have a "catch-all" mw that is setup way in the future, lik
Sorry about that. Ignore my earlier email, I was wrong, the package WILL
NOT run outside a MW as long as the package is configured correctly, even
if it was removed and discovered missing by the application evaluation task.
I tested it again with a MW starting at 10PM.
Line 1 shows the MW starti
The *real* "single pane of glass" is still not there in ConfigMgr + Intune
hybrid environment, Isn't it? For example, When we install FULL Intune
client on a workstation, then we can't manage the device from CM12 console
as that device record won't be visible from CM12 console. To manage those
type
Oh crap you're right, lol. I totally had that backwards. SORRY! I guess I
had a long day too hahaha. I'll test again. Sorry Cesar!
On Mar 4, 2015 6:01 PM, "Robert Spinelli" wrote:
> Maybe I'm reading this wrong, it's been a long day, but you ran it when
> the machine is within a MW. Since the ma
I wish, we’re on a tight budget. We select 3 desktop and laptop models (good,
better, best) each year for people to choose from (and we get good pricing on
them), so we may have 6 new models each year. The problem is, we will have
computers 6 years old or more still around. So that makes for a
Maybe I'm reading this wrong, it's been a long day, but you ran it when the
machine is within a MW. Since the machine has an active open MW it ran,
which is what I would expect to happen.
If you ran it when the MW wasn't active it shouldn't install the application
and then when the MW opens it
Obviously you must have tons of money to waste, that’s what that usually is
called…
-Roland
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Mittwoch, 4. März 2015 23:18
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Get prod
Sorry I should mention that I uninstalled flash previous to the maintenance
window and we have a persistent advert for it
On Mar 4, 2015 4:53 PM, "ccollins9" wrote:
> Actually, no, elsalvoz is incorrect. I was thinking the same as him/her,
> but wasn't 100% sure, so before answering I tested it
Nice catch. That's why we test in production. :)
Cesar A.
Meaning is NOT in words, but inside people! Dr. Myles Munroe.
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 1:53 PM, ccollins9 wrote:
>
> Actually, no, elsalvoz is incorrect. I was thinking the same as him/her, but
> wasn't 100% sure, so before answering I te
One of the great(?) things about working in Higher Ed. It’s difficult to tell
people what they *have* to use. At least we’re managing them. That took forever
to get approved by the million or so committees we have to go through. :)
Mike
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@
Exactly what I thought when I saw that list.
On Wednesday, 4 March 2015, Roland Janus wrote:
> Holy sh.. that’s a lot of models to support and there are probably more
>
> I pity you J
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
> [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
> ] *On
> Be
Actually, no, elsalvoz is incorrect. I was thinking the same as him/her,
but wasn't 100% sure, so before answering I tested it real quick. It looks
like maintenance windows are ignored when an app fails to be found during
the app deployment evaluation.
As you can see in the log excerpts below, th
Yeah, that looks about right.
I dont want the standard laptop, I want *this* one.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:15 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Get produ
Yeah, there are more. :)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 12:39 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Get product name is blank
Holy sh.. that's a lot of models to support and
Holy sh.. thats a lot of models to support and there are probably more
I pity you :)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Mittwoch, 4. März 2015 19:10
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Get product n
I think the same concept applies. Test it though :)
Cesar
On Mar 4, 2015 12:23 PM, "Robert Spinelli" wrote:
> Just to be clear, the apps was already installed let’s say a week ago,
> someone removes the app, and application deployment evaluation runs on its
> own schedule. So if app dep eval ru
Just to be clear, the apps was already installed let’s say a week ago, someone
removes the app, and application deployment evaluation runs on its own
schedule. So if app dep eval runs outside of the maint window it will
re-install the application that was removed when the maint window become op
Yes, app can only run during MW. The logs and status messages would state
waiting for MW to run.
Unless of course, you override the deployment to ignore WM.
Cesar
On Mar 4, 2015 11:56 AM, "Robert Spinelli" wrote:
> I’ve been trying to test this out, but can’t seem to get the scenario
> tested.
I've been trying to test this out, but can't seem to get the scenario
tested.
If you have a maintenance window defined and application deployment
evaluation run does it honor the maint window? If the maint window is for
4PM-6PM and app deploy eval kicks off at 2PM, will it try again when the
m
Yes, that's basically the same thing. Here's our method in the TS:
[cid:image001.png@01D05663.617E69D0]
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Carbone
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:03 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] R
Thanks Mike, I will try that.
I also found this source with another possible way to find this info out.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/6c0668db-b3e8-4515-a0a4-b2a73304babf/csproduct-get-name-not-returning-model?forum=configmgrosd
1. Run wbemtest
2. Connect to root
You could try
wmic computersystem get model
Mike
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Chris Carbone
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 9:49 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Get product name is blank
When I use the command below
Hi Sean,
Yep I've seen that blog, was hoping to use it but seems might not work on
SCCM as the pfe guys didn't test as it was out of scope.
The way our staging works is it adds the machine to the collection and
assigns the site code for that country and various other variables inc
uuid, Mac, offi
Hi Sean,
Yep I've seen that blog, was hoping to use it but seems might not work on
SCCM as the pfe guys didn't test as it was out of scope.
The way our staging works is it adds the machine to the collection and
assigns the site code for that country and various other variables inc
uuid, Mac, offi
When I use the command below, the result is blank. Command prompt will show
"Name" and then nothing below it.
wmic csproduct get name
Has anyone seen this blank before? I use this for the driver package
installation steps.
Thanks
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential
So, it’s less about a gulf between ConfigMgr and Intune and more about
eliminating the need for third party partner solutions?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Niehaus
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 11:37 AM
To: mssms@lists
I see you stirring the pot and raise you, sending you some cold weather your
way. ☺
Honestly, time will tell, my guess is that most server desk staff will pass
along any SU issue to the 3rd level team. Why as it would be to complex for
them to use the KB vs CMTrace. This will increase the cos
Bu, can Set Logic ever truly be effective in an ever-changing industry?
…
There are so many rapid changes, and so much innovation, that every EMM vendor
involved must wrestle with the fact that what was state-of-the-art a year ago
is now a baseline requirement – and all of this must be a
Oh, no you didn’t!!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 7:39 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Wow ? Look how invol ved reading the Windows 10 Win d ows
Update log may become
But,
But, if regular updating goes away in Windows 10, why would you need to
troubleshoot?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Garth Jones
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:33 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Wow ? Loo
I think that it should be added into CMtrace to read the log files!! Otherwise
it will be impossible for anyone to troubleshoot WUA issues!
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:18 AM
To: mssms@list
Semi-circular logic:
* Rich PC management will continue to be an on-premises workload.
* Enterprise Mobility Management will be delivered via cloud services.
* IT wants a single tool for managing PCs and mobile devices.
* Organizations will begin to shift t
It’s supposed to get better, but yes, it does make it more difficult.
P.S. I wrote about it here:
http://winsupersite.com/windows-10/microsoft-makes-troubleshooting-windows-update-windows-10-tad-bit-more-difficult
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.c
Clients fallback because content is not in their assigned DP.
Any fallback DP is fair game.
As for the overlapping boundaries. Those can potentially be different
subnet by bits used in the subnet mask. I use a tool to calculate those.
Couldn't say just by seeing it.
Cesar
On Mar 4, 2015 6:38 AM,
Thatâs been all over the PatchManagement.org list a few weeks ago. The rumor is
the process will be drastically improved by RTM.
Daniel Ratliff
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Robert Hastings
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 10:07 AM
To:
Interesting, double work.
Thanks for the link.
Cesar
On Mar 4, 2015 7:09 AM, "Robert Hastings" wrote:
> I was forwarded this link which outlines the purposed process for reading
> the Windows Update log in Windows 10. I canât figure out why they want
> to make this so difficult. This might
I was forwarded this link which outlines the purposed process for reading
the Windows Update log in Windows 10. I canât figure out why they want to
make this so difficult. This might be a good blog post on My IT Forum⦠I
provide some feedback under the âGive Feedbackâ section. So much f
Timely article from Mr Anderson today on this very topic -
http://blogs.technet.com/b/in_the_cloud/archive/2015/03/04/what-we-re-doing-amp-why-we-ll-do-it-our-enterprise-mobility-world-views.aspx
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of rodtr...@
Yeah. I have found overlaps in AD Sites here.
Actual Example:
10.1.1.0/23 assigned to SiteA
10.1.1.0/24 assigned to SiteB
10.1.2.0/24 assigned to SiteB
Is this next issue boundary related or just how package deployment works? I
haven't found an answer yet googling.
Example:
2 Primaries, PR1 and P
I agree, is very rare to find AD sites well maintained.
The advantage is one place to maintain.
Cesar
On Mar 4, 2015 5:47 AM, "Jason Sandys" wrote:
> AD sites can work well if (and only if) the subnets are actually
> maintained in AD and the sites set up match the network/ConfigMgr topology.
I too would love to use AD, however we have many sites that don't have DC's
due to their size. So their subnet is registered with the data center that
has the lowest latency in their region.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 8:47 AM Jason Sandys wrote:
> AD sites can work well if (and only if) the subnets a
'AD sites can work well if (and only if) the subnets are actually
maintained in AD and the sites set up match the network/ConfigMgr topology.
This is rarely the case though.'
..and could be out of the ConfigMgr admins control.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Jason Sandys wrote:
> AD sites can
AD sites can work well if (and only if) the subnets are actually maintained in
AD and the sites set up match the network/ConfigMgr topology. This is rarely
the case though.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of elsalvoz
Sent: Wednesday, Mar
Boundaries are mainly about content location/DP lookups. So sure, putting in
one big range is technically valid, but that would also imply you only have one
set of DPs for all of the IPs within that range; i.e., you only have one
well-connected location.
Yes, IP Ranges do consume quite a bit mo
Thanks for the detailed answer.
Another part to this is how do others here handle new machines builds? We use
MDT but don’t have it integrated (long story, political thing) so I’m battling
how to make applications show up on newly provisioned machines in a timely
manner. We have about 1k a
Your site server would get taxed as well as your sql resources. Managing
and maintaining it won't be an easy task either.
I would drive to use AD sites for boundaries.
Cesar
On Mar 4, 2015 4:08 AM, "David Jones" wrote:
> Oh well. I wonder if any one has just said to heck with it and put in the
Oh well. I wonder if any one has just said to heck with it and put in the
range 10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255. The worry here is that one article out
there states that using ranges could eat SQL processing time and some have
fixated on that. We have 35,000 windows computers only in our SCCM and 1200
bou
Yes. We tend to install software on a machine by machine basis because we tend
to have a 1 to 1 basis for machines to users. Ie users don’t tend to jump from
machine to machine. Therefore we ask the user which machine they use (or get
it from reports), then put that machine object into the AD
48 matches
Mail list logo
