@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
That’s what I meant with simple: Don’t bother, just add them all. Through
adding them to local admin, grants them access to install (remote) roles. That
there are a few to many having access
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
But, the only account needing administrators access to other servers is the
site server 's computer account.
Granting dp's access to the sysmgmgt container isn't best practice in my
book, but I wouldn't make a big deal out
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
This discussion is spot on. I was leaning towards adding the DP computer
accounts to a group which already contains the primary's computer account
and has been applied with full permission to the systems
@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
Convenience vs. security ?
In this case I’m not worried about the minor reduction in security, but prefer
the simplicity in managing it.
-R
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
I don't think I'll ever see it that way. I don't feel it is more convenient
to add a system to a group where it isn't needed, seems more inconvenient
than anything else.
I also don't agree with the minor reduction quote
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
I don't think I'll ever see it that way. I don't feel it is more convenient to
add a system to a group where it isn't needed, seems more inconvenient than
anything else.
I also don't agree with the minor reduction quote. You've
Lol :)
The 2nd happens rather often, doesn’t it?
-R
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: Montag, 9. Juni 2014 15:31
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: Samstag, 7. Juni 2014 16:03
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
Indeed, but only add the site servers (primary and secondary
@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
That’s what I meant with simple: Don’t bother, just add them all. Through
adding them to local admin, grants them access to install (remote) roles. That
there are a few to many having access
...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: Sonntag, 8. Juni 2014 09:12
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
Not sure I get what you are saying. You feel it's less of a hassle to add
dp's to a group to grant them rights
access solved for all. Simple? To risky?
-R
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kim Oppalfens
Sent: Sonntag, 8. Juni 2014 09:12
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
Not sure I get what you
.
-R
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: Samstag, 7. Juni 2014 05:07
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
Thanks,
That’s what I thought however I’m
and all
its child objects. Mike D-
From: damon.jo...@justice.tas.gov.au
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 03:06:52 +
Thanks,
That’s what I thought however I’m stuffed if I could find confirmation easily
: Roland Janusmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch
Sent: 7/06/2014 13:30
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
I’d prefer to stick with simple: Add all servers into an AD group, add that
group to local admin group
Can I just get clarification on this,
SCCM 2012 R2 with 1 Primary, SQL on box.
When setting up stock standard DP the installation is failing due to the
primary’s computer account not being a member of the local administrators group
on that system. I can fix this issue but my question is:
Q:
No DPs are required, only site servers and MPs I believe which are the only
ones publishing info to AD.
Cesar A.
Meaning is NOT in words, but inside people! Dr. Myles Munroe
My iPad takes half the blame for misspells.
On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Johns, Damon (DoJ)
@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Permissions on systems management container
No DPs are required, only site servers and MPs I believe which are the only
ones publishing info to AD.
Cesar A.
Meaning is NOT in words, but inside people! Dr. Myles Munroe
My iPad takes half the blame
17 matches
Mail list logo
