Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

  >>> >>> >>> >>>On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:17 AM, Eswar Koneti >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>OK,i did some testing for legacy packages,it seems to be working for me too. >>>after the compliance,i tried deployin

Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

> eswarkon...@outlook.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> OK,i did some testing for legacy packages,it seems to be working for >>> me too. >>> after the compliance,i tried deploying the legacy app >>> ,policyagent.log receives the info about the deployme

Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

nly disabled that >> functionality (other functionality could still work) however the same >> ideaology could be used for disabling the other functionality... >> >> I never completed it but happy to share if anyone wants it >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3

Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

d execmgr.log > generating yellow messages saying '*Can not find client site settings*' . > but the deployments which are already made available in software center do > not affect with this change.users can run the apps from software center > without any problem. > Regar

Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

te: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:56:30 -0700 From: slkissin...@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments? To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Niall kindly forwarded me his Word Document, and using that, I made up two Baselines (and 4 configItem

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

e limitations there as well. Daniel Ratliff From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 9:13 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that preve

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 9:13 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments? Sure, just create an All Deployments Maintenance Window that is 40 years in the future, and apply it to those machines. If

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

um.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments? Sure, just create an All Deployments Maintenance Window that is 40 years in the future, and apply it to those machines. If you’re especially worried about these s

Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

tions there as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Daniel Ratliff* >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: >>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Trevor Sullivan >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 20

Re: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

*Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2014 9:13 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that > prevents any deployments? > > > > Sure, just create an *All Deployments* Maintenance Window that is 40 > years in the future, and apply

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 9:13 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments? Sure, just create an All

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have a Maitenance Window that prevents any deployments?

Sure, just create an All Deployments Maintenance Window that is 40 years in the future, and apply it to those machines. If you’re especially worried about these systems, then you could always consider disabling the ccmexec service, or removing the ConfigMgr client altogether, but then you’d lose