Thanks a lot sherry!
Criselda Hilvano
GDE Team
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 8:48 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] extend hardware inventory in sccm2012
It's actually
Hi all,
As I play around with CM12 I'm trying to figure out how I'm going to make
this new business hours feature fit for our existing software distributions
and software update deployments. Oddly (at least to me) you can't seem to
centrally manage the business hours in terms of specifying the
Business hours are completely unrelated to maintenance windows:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2012/03/28/business-hours-vs-maintenance-windows-with-system-center-2012-configuration-manager.aspx
Business hours allow users to schedule deployments at convenient times for
them
Hi Daniel,
Business Hours means the user can postpone an installation as long as the
deadline does not fall before the next Business Hours window. It's the same as
when you deploy Software updates and set an available from time, with a
deadline of two days later: the user in this case could
Hi,
Quick one, based on the info below, what would you guys recommend as far as
deploying DP's/Secondary's.
Role
Computers
Link Speed
DP?
177
10 MPLS
Secondary?
120
2 MPLS
DP?
100
10 MPLS
DP?
35
4 MPLS
Secondary?
110
2 MPLS
Secondary?
83
2 MPLS
DP?
137
10 MPLS
DP?
70
Install SQL express manually and see what happens?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Srivatsan
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 10:36 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; troy.mar...@1e.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SECONDARY ISSUE
It's
I assume you are working with SCCM 2012, as the answer would be totally
different for 2007 as you cannot throttle DP's in 2007.
I would use a DP at all of those locations.
I have about 90 remote sites, all except for 1 of them are DP's, not
secondaries.
The vast majority of my sites have only
Agreed.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Bradnan, Jerry
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 9:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: DP's or Secondary's
Assuming SCCM 2012, I would use all DPs as well.
Jerry
From:
Media re-direction isn’t possible to my knowledge with any ip kvm.
You’d need some sort of remote access host card in each system.
vPro is the simplest way to do what you want, if the machines support it.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On
Yes I was referring to SCCM2012
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Barnes,Chris
Sent: June-17-13 9:15 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: DP's or Secondary's
I assume you are working with SCCM 2012, as the answer would be
I stand corrected.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Avocent-DSR1031-8-port-KVM-Over-Web-IP-Virtual-Media
-Switch-Unlocked-TESTED-/200916936139?pt=US_KVM_Switches_KVM_Cables
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Avocent-DSR1031-8-port-KVM-Over-Web-IP-Virtual-Medi
Newer IP KVMs can do media redirection, but you’ll definitely pay for it, at
least in larger switches. I’ve never used this product but I’ve heard good
things and it does support virtual media:
http://www.lantronix.com/it-management/kvm-over-ip/securelinx-spider.html
Brendan A. Fusco
Sr.
Thanks for your inputs guys, of course we will be using throttling for content
transfer, the reason why I was more leaning toward secondary's on slow link was
for agent scanning (SU, Hardware, Software inventory).
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
We're wanting to upgrade our CM07 environment to CM12 over the next month or
so. We started working with a consultant nearby but they aren't working out for
us so we're looking for someone new. We really only need help with setting up
the IBCM piece and would like to contract about 10 hours.
Ping me and I can help
Jason Condo | Bennett Adelsonhttp://www.bennettadelson.com/ | Cleveland Region
Principal Consultant - Systems Management Operations
(M) 234.380.9214
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Monday,
What about DirectAccess?
Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
http://trevorsullivan.net/ http://twitter.com/pcgeek86
http://facebook.com/trevor.sullivan
https://plus.google.com/106658223083457664096
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of
Direct Access
...That might be more than 10 hours of work.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CM12 Consultant - Charlotte, NC
What
Hmm, really? I'll have to check that out.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CM12 Consultant - Charlotte, NC
With Windows Server 2012,
Don't you have to have IPv6 for DA to work? That is why we never did it
previously.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 1:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CM12 Consultant -
I believe that, in Windows Server 2012, that requirement was removed
entirely. It still uses IPv6 internally somehow, though.
Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
http://trevorsullivan.net/ http://twitter.com/pcgeek86
http://facebook.com/trevor.sullivan
https://plus.google.com/106658223083457664096
I don't think that's a requirement anymore. It's MUCH easier in server 2012.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Linkey, Mike
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 1:56 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CM12 Consultant - Charlotte,
yes, but a lot of stuff will not go through it, like lync.
cisco anyconnect works a lot better.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Dzikowski, Michael
michael.dzikow...@ally.com wrote:
There is 6 to 4 conversion with teredo I think.
** **
** **
** **
*From:*
I'd suggest putting a secondary at sites with 2Mbit/sec links, and where
there are more than 100 clients. For the other 2Mbit links, create custom
client settings packages and back off their policy polling and hardware
inventory intervals.
I'm sure there are plenty of other, valid approaches.
I know someone in Charlotte who might be perfect for this if you're
interested.
Drop me a note offline and I'll hook you up.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 4:26 PM
To:
CM12-SP1 on Server 12 w/SQL12 - all on one BAS (Thanks Kent A.)
Earlier this morning we configured and SMTP server for email notifications,
enabled Endpoint Protection alerts on a collection, and configured alert
subscriptions. Email was successfully sent on a malware detected alert.
Now,
Never mind, it must have been that big bowl of Duh we had for lunch! We were
looking at the wrong Subscriptions. When we looked at the Subscriptions
under Alerts rather than Reporting, they were right where they were supposed to
be.
. Now, back to your regularly scheduled programming.
Was wondering if anyone deploys disk encryption along with their deployments?
We are looking into this, and just getting a feel for some of the players.
Needs to be manageable and I would like to see something that is easy to
deploy, maybe something that allows us to encrypt after an image (I
2012 makes me really like DA
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Trevor Sullivan
tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com wrote:
With Windows Server 2012, it takes a matter of minutes. Of course, it depends
on how cooperative the networking team is.
Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
Good luck with that. The only full-disk encryption that plays well with OSD and
MDT is ... surprise, Bitlocker - which of course your org cannot use because
(being blunt here) your org was too cheap to actually buy SA and is now ending
up paying even more in the long run because it saved them
Actually we do have SA. It just took them this long to realize that they need
to encrypt data. We currently use WDS/MDT to do our images.
I never understood why they went with Win 7 Pro and not enterprise on the
machines (done before my time). Mistakes made by the past affect the future
right
Look at MBAM 2.0 (offers sccm 2012 integration).
It's a nice management client/console for bitlocker.
Lets you dole out access to helpdesk for recovery keys.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Monday, June 17,
MBAM 2.0 has user self-service portal also.
Bitlocker is very reliable.
Suits shouldn't make technical decisions - case in point.
J
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of chris catlett
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 7:45 PM
To:
32 matches
Mail list logo
