[mssms] RE: sccm (server) clients dropping from collections

2017-01-30 Thread Wendell Hutchison
Hi Cynthia, What are your collections rules for these machines? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Erno, Cynthia M (ITS) Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 3:12 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] sccm (server) clients dropping

[mssms] sccm (server) clients dropping from collections

2017-01-30 Thread Erno, Cynthia M (ITS)
We have sccm 2012. We are noticing that our servers are dropping from collections that we had previously confirmed they were a member of (patch collections). We considered the deletion/re-addition of the object but the logs don't support that. We considered someone manually removing the servers

RE: [mssms] Site boundaries and Waiting for content?

2017-01-30 Thread Schultz, Michael A
Did you see if the new content handling introduced in 1610 may affect you? I couldn't find the production documentation but here is a link for when they mentioned it in TP1609 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/get-started/capabilities-in-technical-preview-1609#bkmk_update Michael

RE: [mssms] Site boundaries and Waiting for content?

2017-01-30 Thread Andreas Hammarskjöld
What does the client logs say? From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of HELMS, DAVID C Sent: den 30 januari 2017 15:55 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [mssms] Site boundaries and Waiting for content? No, I’ve only used IP address

RE: [mssms] Site boundaries and Waiting for content?

2017-01-30 Thread HELMS, DAVID C
No, I’ve only used IP address range. I have a lot of subnets where there is only 1 or 2 devices on it. In cases like these, I would just manually approve the clients in the console and not bother with defining the IP range in the boundary. Now that I’m on version 1610, this is the first

Re: [mssms] Site boundaries and Waiting for content?

2017-01-30 Thread Adam Juelich
Were you just using AD Site before? IP Range is what is recommended On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 8:01 AM, HELMS, DAVID C wrote: > Did something change in SCCM CB 1610, where clients had to be defined > within SCCM site boundaries to download content from a DP? I didn’t have

[mssms] Site boundaries and Waiting for content?

2017-01-30 Thread HELMS, DAVID C
Did something change in SCCM CB 1610, where clients had to be defined within SCCM site boundaries to download content from a DP? I didn't have this issue with 2012 R2, but noticed clients stuck in 'Waiting for content' for a software distribution I had going out this weekend. To resolve this