RE: [mssms] Moving away from image installation?

2017-10-05 Thread Tim Amico
Using a mix of both here with an upgrade to Office 2016 during the in-place. Our end users and help desk love the in-place upgrade from 7 to 10, basically an hour or two later and it’s running Win 10 just the way they had it setup when it was Win 7. If it applies, you might be shaving time

[mssms] RE: List of Computers From Users

2017-09-01 Thread Tim Amico
If going the PowerShell route then why not let it do everything and you could still log the action if you want a record. I do something similar to sync my pilot collections off distribution lists. Not tested, but below is a cleaned up section from my main script that should get you on the

[mssms] RE: Patch Deployment Device Restart Behavior

2017-08-14 Thread Tim Amico
Create a collection with a maintenance window for every Saturday and Sunday then place your critical servers or all servers in the collection. You can set it for all deployments or just Software updates and this way the servers will do nothing during the week unless you manually kick something

RE: [mssms] Device Guard with Symantec EP

2017-01-11 Thread Tim Amico
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Device Guard with Symantec EP Fresh 1607 install or an update? Anything Group Policy related? On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Tim Amico <tim.am...@outlook.com<mailto:tim.am...@outlook.com>> wrote: Anyone running Device Guard w

[mssms] Device Guard with Symantec EP

2017-01-11 Thread Tim Amico
, but they haven't been very helpful and claim they can't reproduce the error. Tim Amico Email: tim.am...@outlook.com<mailto:tim.am...@outlook.com> [LinkedIN]<http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothyamico>[Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/tim.amico.9>[twitter]<http://twitter.com/@tim_amico>

[mssms] RE: Current Branch - Internet Based CLients - Internet facing Site Server Need to be on domain?

2016-12-01 Thread Tim Amico
If a separate domain isn’t an option in the DMZ, then you can look into reverse proxy or the new feature in 1610 as an alternative. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/clients/manage/manage-clients-internet From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On

RE: [mssms] Windows 10 Education

2016-10-31 Thread Tim Amico
Also I think there are a few classroom related features that are only available in the Education SKU. https://blogs.windows.com/windowsexperience/2016/04/14/new-innovations-for-the-classroom-with-the-windows-10-anniversary-update/#pYolIYeR42EYcED2.97 Could also be differences in licensing costs,

RE: [mssms] Re-imaging computers without deleting sccm object

2015-04-01 Thread Tim Amico
Another option for folks that are deploying to collections other than “unknown” would be to just password protect the whole TS outside the boot image that way it can be used in Software Center as well, put a condition on the “Execute Task Sequence” step (or the first step in your TS for those

RE: [mssms] MP selection and MP Affinity

2014-10-24 Thread Tim Amico
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Tim Amico Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:13 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] MP selection and MP Affinity Hello, Just trying to get a little clarification here on publishing

[mssms] MP selection and MP Affinity

2014-10-23 Thread Tim Amico
Hello, Just trying to get a little clarification here on publishing management points, selection, and the new feature for MP affinity in CU3. Background on the setup: SCCM 2012 R2 with CU3 2 HTTPS MPs on the intranet 1 HTTPS MP in the DMZ Since I have all the management points

RE: [mssms] RE: Who uses AMT and Out of Band?

2014-09-05 Thread Tim Amico
It is from a production rollout standpoint. AMT chips have some 3rd party vendor thumbprints built in so you can auto provision without having to touch each device. If you wanted to get this going in your lab you could manually go in the MebX of your lab system and put the thumbprint of your

RE: [mssms] SCCM client on servers that manage a different infrastructure

2014-08-06 Thread Tim Amico
, but as far as I heard, it works. Cheers David From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Tim Amico Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2014 1:55 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: [mssms] SCCM client on servers that manage a different

[mssms] SCCM client on servers that manage a different infrastructure

2014-08-05 Thread Tim Amico
Haven't had a chance to test this out in a lab yet so curios if anyone has some insight first. I have a client that doesn't want to use RBA to separate the server and workstation management in one hierarchy. They want two completely separate infrastructures for servers and workstations, but

RE: [mssms] RE: USMT in OSD 2012 task sequence

2014-06-16 Thread Tim Amico
How about “Notification Settings” for the deployment is “Allow users to run the program independently of assignments” checked? Maybe since it’s required it actually reimaged on its own when you weren’t looking. Even though the report doesn’t reflect that. From: