15:27
An: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Betreff: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
I’ll let Kent answer that one! :)
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: den 1 jul
I’ll let Kent answer that one! ☺
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: den 1 juli 2016 14:56
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: AW: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Ah, the source only was it.
Good to know
@lists.myitforum.com
Betreff: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
And that only breaks something related to driver packages, which nobody seems
to use anyhow.
//A
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
2016 10:36
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Yep you can’t dedupe the content source, but then why would you..
Blog by Johan on the subject..
http://deploymentresearch.com/Research/Post/409/Using-Data-DeDuplication-with-ConfigMgr-2012-R2
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: 30 June 2016 23:43
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: AW: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Isn’t there an issue or “not supported” statement about de-dupe for the DP?
-R
Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>
Subject: AW: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Isn’t there an issue or “not supported” statement about de-dupe for the DP?
-R
Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Im Auftrag von Phil Wilcock
Gese
Nah, thats for the source.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: den 1 juli 2016 00:43
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: AW: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Isn’t there an issue or “not supported” statement
sad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: 29 June 2016 06:18
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com <mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Think even FOREGROUND is gone after 2 BITS suppo
] RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
I wonder how this works if there are vLANs/broadcast domains. I think we might
have some subnets that stretch across multiple building cores and switches. It
could be trouble if clients who think they are on the same subnet start sending
traffic
Yeah, what Daddy bear said ☺
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: 29 June 2016 14:32
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [External] RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Don’t forget the other Win7 BITS
] On
Behalf Of Bradley, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 8:32 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [External] RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Don’t forget the other Win7 BITS hotfix that fixes it if it goes too slow.
It’s the Goldilocks combo…one is too fast, the other
...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Phil Wilcock
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:08 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [External] RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
In Current Branch fairly sure FOREGROUND is no longer used. Previously it was
the default for user initiated
June 2016 06:18
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Think even FOREGROUND is gone after 2 BITS supporters ranted about it… Senior
can you confirm?
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:l
2016 3:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
There are two BITS bandwidth policies, one for content retrieved from the
server and another for content retrieved from a peer. Limiting the server
tra
...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jay Marsett
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:44 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
So much great f
...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jay Marsett
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:44 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
So much great feedback!
We were contemplating utilizing a pretty slow footprint for BITS policy, 1-2MB
let's say, across the board
Marsett
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 12:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
So much great feedback!
We were contemplating utilizing a pretty slow footprint for BITS policy, 1-2MB
let's say, across the board, and then narrow that bandwidth
u) use for your bits transfer rate settings?
>>
>>
>>
>> Jimmy Martin
>> (901) 227-8209
>>
>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *David Jones
>> *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2016 2:00 PM
Martin
> (901) 227-8209
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *David Jones
> *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2016 2:00 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
>
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
I know it’s highly dependent on underlying network capabilities, but what do
you (collective you) use for your bits transfer rate settings?
Jimmy Martin
(901) 227-8209
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
“Collective you” = all y’all
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Jimmy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:43 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
I know it’s highly dependent
, 2016 2:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
That is exactly what we do. 35000 clients. Have had no complaints. But what
does that mean in the big scheme? You could right click any client in the local
network of all the sites and make them
...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Niehaus
Sent: den 26 juni 2016 03:41
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
We need to fix that. I’m willing to offer bribes ☺
Thanks,
-Michael
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.
um.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: Re: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
That is exactly what we do. 35000 clients. Have had no complaints. But what
does that mean in the big scheme? You could right click any client in the local
network of all the sites and make them a
ists.myitforum.com<mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>]
On Behalf Of Jay Parekh
Sent: 24 June 2016 14:45
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Posting for my colleague. Some reason he's post here is
Parekh
> *Sent:* 24 June 2016 14:45
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
>
>
>
> Posting for my colleague. Some reason he's post here is not coming
> through.
>
> Basically comes down to a client is looking to dep
: [mssms] BranchCache, ConfigMgr, and PRO Sku
Posting for my colleague. Some reason he's post here is not coming through.
Basically comes down to a client is looking to deploy a net new SCCM
environment. They have 400 sites but the CTO doesn't want servers (DPs) at the
sites and he will not pay
Posting for my colleague. Some reason he's post here is not coming through.
Basically comes down to a client is looking to deploy a net new SCCM
environment. They have 400 sites but the CTO doesn't want servers (DPs) at the
sites and he will not pay for Nomad or OneSite. Also they are
28 matches
Mail list logo
