That is still correct, but it doesn’t limit client management in any way.
J From: <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> on behalf of Stephen Owen <sre...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "mdt...@lists.myitforum.com" <mdt...@lists.myitforum.com> Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 8:10 PM To: "mdt...@lists.myitforum.com" <mdt...@lists.myitforum.com> Cc: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" <mssms@lists.myitforum.com> Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] ConfigMgr CB Design Question - Multi Forest No trust I thought that your ConfigMgr Primary server must be a domain member, is that not the case anymore? On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:02 AM, S ConfigMgr <configmgrarch...@gmail.com<mailto:configmgrarch...@gmail.com>> wrote: I have a requirement to implement ConfigMgrCB in no trust forest(s) I can understand that we can follow this link http://blog.coretech.dk/kea/multi-forest-support-in-configmgr-2012-part-i-managing-clients-in-an-untrusted-forest/ and the same was explained in ms TechNet document https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/plan-design/hierarchy/communications-between-endpoints#BKMK_clientspan under (communications Across AD Forest Section). I have below Questions to experts in this forum. What are the ConfigMgrCB features are not supported when I implemented above no Forest level Trust? What features are not included if I implemented above scenario ? Is there any limitation of number Devices or User's management in non-Forest’s scenario ? What happens if I implement ConfigMgrCB in Internet mode only ? Do we think this is a best scenario to go for internet based ? Note:- my client is strict and not ready to go for Forest to Forest Trust... Hence these questions come.
