Re: [External] [mssms] RE: Driver management - opinions?

2017-04-19 Thread Adam Juelich
m.com] *On Behalf Of *Jerousek, Jeff > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 19, 2017 1:30 PM > > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [External] [mssms] RE: Driver management - opinions? > > > > So you still need the packages on all of the remote DPs? > > > >

RE: [External] [mssms] RE: Driver management - opinions?

2017-04-19 Thread Marable, Mike
On Behalf Of Miller, Todd Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 10:54 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: RE: [External] [mssms] RE: Driver management - opinions? Is it unclear to me what you do about non-conforming computer models in this method. With no drivers loaded into Configmgr directly, there is

RE: [External] [mssms] RE: Driver management - opinions?

2017-04-19 Thread Miller, Todd
Is it unclear to me what you do about non-conforming computer models in this method. With no drivers loaded into Configmgr directly, there is no "chaos theory" for unsupported models to fall back to. This seems like it would work perfectly for a perfectly managed organization, but my reality