Hi all,
[Mappers]
I have a little idea:
What if someone writes a mapper support driver for DOS1? Shouldn't be too
hard. Programs could even install such a driver themselves so that they
can switch the mapper using a single interface.
Ehm... I thought MemMan was just that. A mapper
Hi,
From: "MSX Brazilian Team" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MBT
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 17:03:15 -0300
today I sent for you a IPO in the value of US$20. I ask that informs me
as
soon as to receive the money. I didn't have the intention of
Hello,
Who knows if it is possible to use an IDE and SCSI interfaces at the
same time on an MSX and copy from one hard disk to other.
Thanks. Alberto
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the
Somehow, I always seem to forget the URL in these kind of messages.
Put it in your signature, like I do! ;-)
Can someone please tell me how to let Outlook Express add a signature???
~Grauw
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not
Hardware DMA indeed not possible with the builtin chips in the MSX.
But the term DMA stems from long ago (CP/M for eaxmple) when with DMA was
meant the memory location/buffer where the transferred data to/from is
stored.
That's not DMA, that's DTA... Disk Transfer Area.
~Grauw
MSX
I recently bought a F1-spirit cartridge at a stuffed animal fair (what was
'rommelmarkt' again?), for fl.7,50. The reason this price was so low was
that the asshole had cut out the game-ROM. Aargh. But anyway, I have a
empty cartridge with SCC now... Where is the description of this ESE-SCC?
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz wrote:
PLEEZ MAN!!!
English...
Ok! Next time it will be a private e-mail.
But take it easy! Some time ago (2 years) many people answered e-mails in
dutch, and I never complained about it!
Dutch people did...
---
Visit the internet
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Ricardo Jurczyk Pinheiro wrote:
At 13:19 24/03/99 +0100, you wrote:
MSX and DMA??? Seems quite impossible to me...
Isn't it?
Nope dudez, I've heard a lot about these possibilities, of MSX and
DMA... Of course, rebuilding the computer and peripherals. But I
On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Jon De Schrijder wrote:
Can you all agree with the following?
It is important for both MSX software- and hardware-developers that we
all can come to an agreement.
Probably there are still memorymappers procuded nowadays and also
software depending on these.
A very good
On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
Besides, what kind of program would leave the mapper in a different state
than when it was started?
I am busy on a muli-tasking system that cuts programs off on the
interrupt. It is very well possible that one program sets the mappers is
some
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Mappers]
I have a little idea:
What if someone writes a mapper support driver for DOS1? Shouldn't be too
hard. Programs could even install such a driver themselves so that they
can switch the mapper using a single interface.
Sure you are right, DTA is the correct name. And the one we should use.
The term DMA was often used in CP/M (and often DMA hardware support was
available in S100 bus systems) and therefore it appears sometimes because
MSXDOS inherited much from CP/M.
-Original Message-
From: Laurens
On 29 Mar 1999 13:57:20 +0200, in local.msx.int you wrote:
Hello,
Who knows if it is possible to use an IDE and SCSI interfaces at the
same time on an MSX and copy from one hard disk to other.
Thanks. Alberto
Yes, that is possible. The SCSI is allways the first HD
Stichting Sunrise Team
] A very good initiative.
]
] *memorymapped RAM is optional for MSX2
]
] *The size of a memorymapper is at least 64kB (four pages of 16kB)
]
] I don't agree with this. Although all mappers are at least 64kB, I don't
] see any reason for demanding it to be.
Huh? You don't agree with the
] Here we need to establish some extra rules; is the following allowed for a
] mapper?
] 4-bit 128kB mapper:
] 0,1,2,3=ram
] 4,5,6,7=nothing (no ram, databus high-imped)
] 8,9,a,b=ram (other memory than blocks 0,1,2,3)
] c,d,e,f=nothing
]
] I think we should not allow such mapperconstructions
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, shevek wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
Besides, what kind of program would leave the mapper in a different state
than when it was started?
I am busy on a muli-tasking system that cuts programs off on the
interrupt. It is very well possible
16 matches
Mail list logo
