Take some black boxes.
Give the same imput to all the boxes.
Watch the outputs.
If the output is the same for all the boxes, the boxes are identical
regardless what there is inside each one.
Ciao!
Maurizio Morandi
a.k.a MxM Softworks on Msx
$ IN MSX WE TRUST $
MSX
Tristan wrote:
This is only partly true. First, the OPL chip used on ADLIBs is not
called OPL1. Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The
OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1
chips and delivers exactly
Hi,
I'm looking for a Konami with SCC. Anyone that can
help me
TIA,
RJ
>> Hi, I'm looking for a Konami with SCC. Anyone that can help me TIA, RJ
You're not alone.
Greetings Richard
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes :-) Problems?
] Is Wavy supported by FastCopy?
Yes. See my homepage for the drivers.
Kind regards,
Alex Wulms
--
Alex Wulms/XelaSoft - MSX of anders NIX - Linux 4 ever
See my homepage for info on the *** XSA *** format
http://www.inter.nl.net/users/A.P.Wulms
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an
] Tristan wrote:
] This is only partly true. First, the OPL chip used on ADLIBs is not
] called OPL1. Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
]
] OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The
] OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1
] chips and
Coen van der Geest wrote:
Hi there,
But if I run an MSX1 game on BrMSX, using a video card with TV-out and an
MSX joystick connected to the PC, and I hide the PC itself from sight, can
you tell the difference with a real MSX1?
Did I hear Turing Test? *grin* (OK, someone already used
Tristan wrote:
Each and every ad-lib compatible soundcard can emulate FM Pac and FM-part
of music module, since the ad-lib contains the OPL1 FM-Chip. Each sound
blaster compatible soundcard can emulate FM Pac, FM-part of music module
and ADPCM part of music module, since the
Wasn't OPLL the LANGUAGE to program the opl in the pac?..
greetz
akai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the
quotes :-) Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Wulms wrote:
Differences are minor. In general, you can say
that the OPL1 is a superset of the OPLL. There
are only two functions which the OPLL has but
which the OPL1 does not have:
Anyway, this was my point. `:) I didn't say that
OPL1 couldn't emulate OPLL (just making sure I
was not
Maurizio wrote:
Take some black boxes.
Give the same imput to all the boxes.
Watch the outputs.
If the output is the same for all the boxes, the boxes are identical
regardless what there is inside each one.
good...now we only need a keyboard, tv-out and tv emulator :)
grtz
akai
AkA DanSHakU wrote:
Wasn't OPLL the LANGUAGE to program the opl in the pac?..
No way! :) It's a soundchip by Yamaha.
To program the OPLL you use its sound
registers, which are ultimately set by
some ML* program. :)
You could create a music in Basic, but
it's the macrolanguage interpreter (in
Pablo Vasques Bravo-Villalba wrote:
AkA DanSHakU wrote:
Wasn't OPLL the LANGUAGE to program the opl in the pac?..
No way! :) It's a soundchip by Yamaha.
Ok... my mistake... just got a bit confused... i thought that OPL1 was
the chip and OPLL was the BASIC language...sigh...it's been so
Pablo,
* machine language. I don't know if
this has the same meaning outside
Brazil... :)
Maybe better saying "assembly language"? :)
What we call, in portuguese, "linguagem de maquina" or "linguagem
de montagem" or, yet, "linguagem assembly", also erroneous called
Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
Maybe better saying "assembly language"? :)
Yeah, perhaps :)
That's not what I originally meant, but
I'm unsure if I could explain it in
english.
I remember when I programmed assembly for
Apple II I used to call the hex dumps
"machine language", and
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Alex Wulms wrote:
] Is Wavy supported by FastCopy?
Yes. See my homepage for the drivers.
Right! Thanks. Could you send us an overview about Wavy FDC?
Greetings from Brazil!
-
Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, AkA DanSHakU wrote:
Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
the FM-PAC (MSX-Music). I know of no way to create the OPLL hardware
voices on an OPLx chip, unless there is some way to extracht OPL data
for these voices from the OPLL.
do a romdump of
Dear all,
Sorry to bother you with this test messages. Just migrated to a new linux
distribution and I'm testing my new email setup.
Kind regards,
Alex Wulms
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put
in the body (not subject) "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL
At 09:24 AM 7/15/99 -0300, you wrote:
OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The
OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1
chips and delivers exactly the same output.
I thought that OPL2 didn't include the ADPCM part.
Bye,
Maarten
MSX
] On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Alex Wulms wrote:
]
] ] Is Wavy supported by FastCopy?
] Yes. See my homepage for the drivers.
]
] Right! Thanks. Could you send us an overview about Wavy FDC?
Wavy contains the TC8566AF, just like the MSX turbo R. A couple of weeks ago
I sent the TC8566AF datasheets
] On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, AkA DanSHakU wrote:
]
] Second, AFAIK that OPL is not equal to the OPLL used on
] the FM-PAC (MSX-Music). I know of no way to create the OPLL hardware
] voices on an OPLx chip, unless there is some way to extracht OPL data
] for these voices from the OPLL.
]
]
] Alex Wulms wrote:
] Differences are minor. In general, you can say
] that the OPL1 is a superset of the OPLL. There
] are only two functions which the OPLL has but
] which the OPL1 does not have:
]
] Anyway, this was my point. `:) I didn't say that
] OPL1 couldn't emulate OPLL (just making
] Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
] Maybe better saying "assembly language"? :)
]
] Yeah, perhaps :)
]
] That's not what I originally meant, but
] I'm unsure if I could explain it in
] english.
]
] I remember when I programmed assembly for
] Apple II I used to call the hex dumps
]
Below, you can find the registersettings needed to reproduce the opll
hardware instruments on an OPL1. With thanks to Bernard Lamers and Hans
Guijt for this information:
Nr Register settingsName
Are these extracted from the OPLL chip (they are not in the msx-music
rom afaik) or
This is indeed the correct usage of the words machine language and assembly
language. It is a fact that a lot of people say machine language when they
actually mean assembly language. Most self-proclaimed machine language
programmers are actually assembler language programmers. Only real
Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
At 09:24 AM 7/15/99 -0300, you wrote:
OPL1 is contained inside the OPL2 used by AdLib cards. The
OPL1 part of OPL2 chips is register-compatible with OPL1
chips and delivers exactly the same output.
I thought that OPL2 didn't include the ADPCM part.
Bye,
26 matches
Mail list logo
