Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-03 Thread Sander Zuidema
Hey guyz, Because of the time difference, bad English and a not-so-well known April Fools Day some people in Japan actually believed this pun. So errr. Uzix is not dead yet ;) But considering the huge coding efforts of Chaos, I suggest we carry on with our development of Windows msXP. I think

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-03 Thread Stephen Pedrosa Eilert
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Sander Zuidema wrote: Hey guyz, Because of the time difference, bad English and a not-so-well known April Fools Day some people in Japan actually believed this pun. So errr. Uzix is not dead yet ;) I live in Brazil but when I read the message it was some

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-02 Thread Eric Boon
Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st: Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-02 Thread Eric Boon
d-fader wrote: here we go: 10 cls 20 color 15,4,4 23 width 80 Nah, make that a width 132:height 55 More text on the screen is cool Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-02 Thread Albert Beevendorp
At 10:16 2-4-02 +0200, you wrote: Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st: Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Of which year? :) GreeTz, BiFi Visit my Home Page at

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-02 Thread eMeSiX
Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric looks like the spainish are ahead 93 days :-) and aprils fools day is started in brielle the netherlands.

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-02 Thread Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia
At 10:16 02/04/2002 +0200, you wrote: Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia wrote on April 1st: Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric Or 272, depends -- For info, see

RE: UZIX is dead

2002-04-02 Thread Stephan Szarafinski
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: UZIX is dead Hi, here in Spain is 28th of December Hm, I've *always* known that Spain was a bit behind, but only now I see that it's exactly 93 days ;-) Eric looks like the spainish are ahead 93 days :-) and aprils fools day is started in brielle

UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Hi, After thinking a lot about it, I decided to kill UZIX. After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC, I realized that I don't want it happening on my MSX. So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved MSX. I'll put my efforts on a beautiful GUI,

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread iamweasel
Hmmm, After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does, but what about the other countries? PS: I joined the Windows MSXP team in order to work with Adriano in his new OS. []s Mauricio Braga.

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread Carlos de Santa-Ana Garcia
At 14:08 01/04/2002 -0300, you wrote: Hmmm, After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does, but what about the other countries? PS: I joined the Windows MSXP team in order to work with Adriano in his

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread Albert Beevendorp
At 13:53 1-4-02 +, you wrote: After thinking a lot about it, I decided to kill UZIX. After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC, I realized that I don't want it happening on my MSX. So, I'll quit UZIX development and will start another OS for our beloved MSX. I'll put my

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread Richard Atkinson
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, After reading this great news from Adriano, I was wondering: Does all Countries in the world celebrate 1st April ? I know United Kingdon Does, but what about the other countries? Actually it was invented in 1948 by the United States of

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread iamweasel
Em 01 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: I definately support your idea. I can even offer some assistance! About a year ago I wrote some MMU routines, with complete support for virtual memory, memory protection and memory swapping. Those routines are already written in MSX BASIC so can be

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread David Heremans
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:53:25PM +, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: Hi, After many crashes of that stupid Linux OS I'm using on my PC,... I told you that micorsoft is always right :-) operating system called Windows msXP. Yep, it's all in the name. Free (386)BSD made the

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread iamweasel
Em 01 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: I definately support your idea. I can even offer some assistance! About a year ago I wrote some MMU routines, with complete support for virtual memory, memory protection and memory swapping. Those routines are already written in MSX BASIC so can be

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread d-fader
Hey, I wanna help too, that's why I've been working since I received the message. Ofcourse, new operating systems need to crash a lot, that's why I already made that part! (it's taken from the Teddy's In Action windows emulator...), problem is that routine was in asm, so that's a bit too fast

Re: UZIX is dead

2002-04-01 Thread Sander Zuidema
I prefer this one in WIDTH 40 ;) Sander http://www.msx.org http://www.benjaminb.nl - Original Message - From: d-fader [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 23:13 Subject: Re: UZIX is dead Hey, I wanna help too, that's why I've been working since I

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-26 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Eric, I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me. Please, I'd like to have all info anyway - even if I don't get to write the Novaxis driver for Uzix32 :-) Ok. Erh, can't I use/rewrite the MegaSCSI routines and keep floppy support? Or is the floppy also

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-20 Thread Eric Boon
Adriano de Cunha wrote: Get UZIX sources from UZIX page. Will do, will do :-) I can send you the Novaxis info that Maico Arts sent me. Please, I'd like to have all info anyway - even if I don't get to write the Novaxis driver for Uzix32 :-) You will need to rewrite all the DEVFLOP.MSX

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-18 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Eric, Hm, I still would like to see Novaxis stuff in the Uzix I have now. If the sources of Uzix32 are released, will there be enough info to hack in the novaxis support (and e.g. cut out the IDE or MegaSCSI stuff...) ?? Or would it be possible to take the Novaxis driver for Uzix48 and use

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
If no one wants to send me a Novaxis for Christmas ;) [I send it back, I promess], I will need beta testers when the Novaxis driver be ready. Volunteers, anyone? :) Of course Eric and I will be happy to test it (again)! The parallel-live-chat helped a lot. We'll have to arrange that again

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Manuel, Of course Eric and I will be happy to test it (again)! The parallel-live-chat helped a lot. We'll have to arrange that again next time! Of course! Any ideas yet about how to get it working on or (according to you WEIRD) Yes! Weird! Weird! Weird! :P :)

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
Yes. Maico Arts send me interestings docs and sources of Novaxis. Next UZIX HD drivers will use direct access to MegaSCSI/IDE/Novaxis/ floppy/etc BIOS (for floppies I'll use Alex Wulms's FastCopy drivers, so no more slowdown problems with your MSXs). I think the problem with Novaxis will be

RE: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread adisak
UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :) Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So, you'll have to wait relatively long... Hi! I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k

RE: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Hi, I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? UZIX48k kernel will have 64kb. :) Regards, = Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :) Okay, that's right... Forgot that... :-) Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else on UZIX32k kernel. So, you'll have to wait relatively long... Okay, we'll do that. I'm looking forward to Uzix48k! Keep us updated! :-) Grtjs, Manuel PS: MSX 4

RE: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Daniel Caetano
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote: Hi! I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? the 48k of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano already said, Uzix48k will have a 64Kb kernel.

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Ivan Latorre
Daniel Caetano wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:33:26 +0200, adisak wrote: Hi! I`m not much of a coder, but if you have trouble fitting stuff into the 32k kernel, why not make the next one larger than 48k ? the 48k of Uzix48k name is not about kernel size. As Adriano already said, Uzix48k

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Ivan, But, is the new Uzix going to be called Uzix48k? I don't like this name. I prefer simply Uzix. I like UZIX also. I like it so much that UZIX will not be named UZIX48k, but only UZIX. The difference will be the version number. The first thought that shaked my head when

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-16 Thread Eric Boon
- Original Message - From: Manuel Bilderbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:52 PM Subject: Re: UZIX is dead UZIX32k is dead, as the subject says. :) Okay, that's right... Forgot that... :-) Sorry, but it's impossible to put anything else

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Saku Taipale
What I would appreciate is Sunrise IDE support for UZIX, or is it implemented already ? Read the Docs Stt :)) It's allready implemented. What we need is support for the Sunrise RS232 so a lot of european people can connect their msx to a PC and browse the internet with their

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Eric Boon
Adriano: [UZIX = dead] Hmmm, what about the Novaxis SCSI support? :-) That's a limitation of UZIX32k that I want to break. :) Ah Ok :-) How much people here would like to help such project? I would, definitely. In two years that the UZIX site is up, two or three guys really

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread M. J. Bethlehem
I would be interested in helping the development as well, but since I only own 2 MSX1s, I'll have to make do with an MSX2(+) emulator. Also it's been some time since I did any programming on the MSX. I've only been able to run the disk image on fMSX and it works fine and looks good. A

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Read the Docs Stt :)) It's allready implemented. What we need is support for the Sunrise RS232 so a lot of european people can connect their msx to a PC To a PC, Sandy??? It's like killing a fly with a cannon... About Sunrise RS232: I'll work on it. If anyone has

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Martin, A question for you: exactly what filesystem does UZIX run on? Is it a MINIX (like) filesystem, or an entirely own variant? It's a variant of the classic inode structure of the UNIX FS. Inodes, direct blocks, indirect blocks, double indirect blocks. Adriano Camargo

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Eric Boon
(2) You showed no intention of releasing *anything* of UZIX, except the one-big-binary-package. If you read the Introduction section on UZIX page, you would notice that I wrote: When finished, the entire UZIX project will be released to the public for free. Ok, point taken, but when

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Eric Boon
(2) You showed no intention of releasing *anything* of UZIX, except the one-big-binary-package. If you read the Introduction section on UZIX page, you would notice that I wrote: When finished, the entire UZIX project will be released to the public for free. Ok, point taken, but when

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Eric, If you read the Introduction section on UZIX page, you would notice that I wrote: When finished, the entire UZIX project will be released to the public for free. Ok, point taken, but when the project is finished doesn't encourage me to go an jump on in :-) It's

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Eric Boon
I mumbled: [something again] Sorry for the double - outlook espresso hickupped... Eric -- For info, see http://www.stack.nl/~wynke/MSX/listinfo.html

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Marco Antonio Simon dal Poz
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: (3) UZIX doesn't run comfortably on my machine - running from flop is **s**l**o**w** and my HD interface was not supported (heheh ;-)) If I had a Novaxis, you can bet UZIX would run on it. But I don't have

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-13 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
But I don't have even a HD interface (Dal Poz borrowed his Sunrise IDE to me, that's why UZIX has HD support). But it's not an excuse to me to not work on UZIX. I didn't borrowed Sunrise IDE, I lent Sunrise IDE for you. You borrowed my Sunrise IDE. I had 50% chance and I

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-12 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha
Eric, This UZIX, codename UZIX32k, is dead. Everything that could be made with it was done (even graphical webbrowsing). Anything else can't be made (and well done) because there's no free space on kernel, or more memory for applications. Hmmm, what about the Novaxis SCSI

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-12 Thread Saku Taipale
Hmmm, what about the Novaxis SCSI support? :-) That's a limitation of UZIX32k that I want to break. :) What I would appreciate is Sunrise IDE support for UZIX, or is it implemented already ? Greetings: Saku Taipale, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For info, see

Re: UZIX is dead

2001-07-12 Thread Sandy Pleyte
On Friday 13 July 2001 08:07, you wrote: Hmmm, what about the Novaxis SCSI support? :-) That's a limitation of UZIX32k that I want to break. :) What I would appreciate is Sunrise IDE support for UZIX, or is it implemented already ? Read the Docs Stt :)) It's allready implemented.