Re: Out to #FC-#FF

2000-06-29 Thread Laurens Holst

 Cache makes your drive much slower. My Sunrise IDE:
 w/o cache: 230 kbps
 w/ cache: 50 kbps

 How did you test this? By just testing disk I/O time?

Yes. And you should have quoted (or at least read) the rest of my message
too.


 Well then you probably
 don't understand caching: (I can hardly believe it, me explaining you
 something :-) )

I already know how cache works. Otherwise I wouldn't use it, don't you
think?


 present in the cache -  is needed again, cache is just a waste of time.
 Cache doesn't make I/O faster, but reduces the times the slowest I/O is
 needed. So in practice you will gain speed.
 How larger the memory used for cache, how higher the chance used data is
 present in the cache, so how faster disk acces becomes.

I know, but as I said the gain in speed reading cached data is very small
compared to when using non-cached data only. And the loss in speed when
reading non-cached data is huge.

Let me explain you something about how the Sunrise IDE-interface works (and
I think the MegaSCSI also works this way). The interface uses a
memory-mapped I/O system, hence it doesn't use any I/O ports, but memory
addresses instead. It is designed in a very smart way, because the sector
read from the drive is DIRECTLY loaded into a dedicated area of the
IDE-interface its memory. The only thing which has to be done is using an
LDIR to move it to the appropriate location.

When caching the data (first time scenario), an additional LDIR is issued to
move it to the cache-memory, so that makes 2 LDIR's per sector read, instead
of one without cache. When reading cached data, it is LDIRed from the
cache-memory, but when reading from disk also only one LDIR is used, so in
that case there is no gain either (but also no loss). In theory there still
is a small gain in the last scenario, because the cache can LDIR the cached
data in larger chunks, and it doesn't have to wait for the harddisk (however
you won't really notice it on MSX with new harddisks). But in practice, this
gain is very little and absolutely NOT worth 50% of my 2MB mapper and the
slow first-time loading.

On my old BERT (I/O-based) SCSI-interface, the non-cached transfer rate was
about 50kb/s. So on that one, caching really did make a difference.


~Grauw


--

 email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
  visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/




MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: What happened?

2000-06-29 Thread Laurens Holst

  So, what happened? Where did everyone go?
 
 Uneducated guess: the normal end-of-school stress?

Well at least that's the case here...


~Grauw


--

 email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
  visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/




MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: Sony computer

2000-06-29 Thread Laurens Holst

 Hello MSXers around the world.

 I am not an expert in the English language, but lets try.
 Last month I bought a Sony HB-F1XV MSX 2+ from a friend. Its my
 first japanese MSX and its has some bit differences from the others
 brazilian computers. IMHO its great!

Ofcourse.


 First of all I would like to know if there are any manual of this
 computer around the Web, or if someone could sell me a copy of it. The
 major informations I need is about the Speed Controler and Ren-Sha Turbo
 sliders.

Aren't they the same??? Well, my Sanyo MSX2+ has only one slider, and a
pause button. With the slider you can regulate the autofire (influences the
spacebar and joystick firebutton). The Pause key completely halts the
computer. It's useful with puzzlegames of which the software-pausebutton
scrambles up the screen, or with games which haven't got a pause-button at
all. And ofcourse to see how certain things are being done.


 The organization of the memory Slots is wanted too. If you have
 any files related with F1XV please contact me.

Pfff... Just run Compass (even the Beta will do), and see what it reports in
the slot layout section.


~Grauw


--

 email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
  visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/




MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: What happened?

2000-06-29 Thread Laurens Holst

 Pepijn Prive wrote:
  vacation? what a lousy excuse!

 I guess he meant vacation from the list. ;)

  any selfrespecting computerfreak
  takes his laptop/palmtop with him
  or her to email. if anyone doesn't
  own one of those devices, they can
  always visit an internet cafe.

 In Holland, that is. :)

Nahh... Even in Sweden, in my uncle's town (which is quite small) there is
an internet-cafe. And here in Bussum you can use public internet in the
library. But when I was on holidays in Germany (last summer), I couldn't
find any public internet access until we arrived in the large city Trier
(and two days later we got home :)).

So I actually think you're right, it depends per country (or rather: per
area). But I don't really think it has something to do with economy or
something like that... We weren't visiting a poor area of Germany, and my
Uncle's town in Sweden isn't that rich (and everything is awfully expensive
there).


~Grauw


--

 email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
  visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/




MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: Out to #FC-#FF

2000-06-29 Thread David Heremans

Laurens Holst wrote:
 
 I already know how cache works. Otherwise I wouldn't use it, don't you
 think?

A lot of people don't know how their PC work neither and still they do
use them. So I would say that can not really count as a valid argument.
(You later on prove you know what you're talking about so don't take
this personally)

David


MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




RE: Out to #FC-#FF

2000-06-29 Thread Frits Hilderink


Hi,

Ofcourse there is a huge performance loss instead of just copying
the data to its final destination, which probably is just on step.
You have to read and write all data a second time to be able
to store it in the cache.

The problem with the storage is that you also have to select the
most ideal situation to be able to execute a simple LDIR to copy
the data. And maybe some extra slotswitches and memory mapper
switches through the proper channels if your working with DOS2.

If there should be something that a caching mechanism should
eliminate then it would be the seek times of a harddisk, that is
if the seek times are a problem.

How about optimizing the caching of the FAT and directory structures.


Frits


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf 
 Of Laurens
 Holst
 Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 3:30 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Out to #FC-#FF
 
 
  Cache makes your drive much slower. My Sunrise IDE:
  w/o cache: 230 kbps
  w/ cache: 50 kbps
 
  How did you test this? By just testing disk I/O time?
 
 Yes. And you should have quoted (or at least read) the rest 
 of my message
 too.
 
 
  Well then you probably
  don't understand caching: (I can hardly believe it, me 
 explaining you
  something :-) )
 
 I already know how cache works. Otherwise I wouldn't use it, don't you
 think?
 
 
  present in the cache -  is needed again, cache is just a 
 waste of time.
  Cache doesn't make I/O faster, but reduces the times the 
 slowest I/O is
  needed. So in practice you will gain speed.
  How larger the memory used for cache, how higher the chance 
 used data is
  present in the cache, so how faster disk acces becomes.
 
 I know, but as I said the gain in speed reading cached data 
 is very small
 compared to when using non-cached data only. And the loss in 
 speed when
 reading non-cached data is huge.
 
 Let me explain you something about how the Sunrise 
 IDE-interface works (and
 I think the MegaSCSI also works this way). The interface uses a
 memory-mapped I/O system, hence it doesn't use any I/O ports, 
 but memory
 addresses instead. It is designed in a very smart way, 
 because the sector
 read from the drive is DIRECTLY loaded into a dedicated area of the
 IDE-interface its memory. The only thing which has to be done 
 is using an
 LDIR to move it to the appropriate location.
 
 When caching the data (first time scenario), an additional 
 LDIR is issued to
 move it to the cache-memory, so that makes 2 LDIR's per 
 sector read, instead
 of one without cache. When reading cached data, it is LDIRed from the
 cache-memory, but when reading from disk also only one LDIR 
 is used, so in
 that case there is no gain either (but also no loss). In 
 theory there still
 is a small gain in the last scenario, because the cache can 
 LDIR the cached
 data in larger chunks, and it doesn't have to wait for the 
 harddisk (however
 you won't really notice it on MSX with new harddisks). But in 
 practice, this
 gain is very little and absolutely NOT worth 50% of my 2MB 
 mapper and the
 slow first-time loading.
 
 On my old BERT (I/O-based) SCSI-interface, the non-cached 
 transfer rate was
 about 50kb/s. So on that one, caching really did make a difference.
 
 
 ~Grauw
 
 
 --
 
  email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or ICQ: 10196372
   visit my homepage at http://grauw.blehq.org/
 
 
 
 
 MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
 the body (not the subject) of the message.
 Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
  The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
  The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
  The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
 


MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




4kb contest.

2000-06-29 Thread Daniel Zorita

Sp, June 29th 2000

 Hello.

Only to say that there is still only 1 week until the deadline for the 4KB
MSX1 Game contest.
( it ends July 7th 2000 )
Several people says there is not time enough.
As the main objetive is to get several MSX1 games, and the best quality
possible,
if you (who are programming a game for the contest) think,
we can give an extra week for the contest.

But all programmers must agree.

Please, reply soon, if you need an extra week, or if you want to keep the
current date of July 7th.

 Bye,

Daniel Zorita.

*Please write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *

===


===




MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: Sony computer

2000-06-29 Thread Aleck Zander

On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Laurens Holst wrote:

  First of all I would like to know if there are any manual of this
  computer around the Web, or if someone could sell me a copy of it. The
  major informations I need is about the Speed Controler and Ren-Sha Turbo
  sliders.
 
 Aren't they the same??? Well, my Sanyo MSX2+ has only one slider, and a
 pause button. With the slider you can regulate the autofire (influences the
 spacebar and joystick firebutton). The Pause key completely halts the
 computer. It's useful with puzzlegames of which the software-pausebutton
 scrambles up the screen, or with games which haven't got a pause-button at
 all. And ofcourse to see how certain things are being done.

My Sony has 2 sliders.. I think this autofire is the Ren-Sha Turbo
(my japanese is worst than my english).. I have the Pause button too, its
a yellow button... You can see the sliders at funet 
   ftp://ftp.funet.fi/graphics/jpg/hardware/Sony_HB-F1XD_4.jpg
Its a F1XD, but the layout is the same of the F1XV

  The organization of the memory Slots is wanted too. If you have
  any files related with F1XV please contact me.
 
 Pfff... Just run Compass (even the Beta will do), and see what it reports in
 the slot layout section.

Compass?? Where can I find it?

T++

--  --
Aleck Zander-   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Lookin' for musicians

2000-06-29 Thread Frederik Boelens

Hi all!!

We (TeddyWareZ) are busy with a new project, and therefore we need some
musics... No moonsound music ofcourse... cause moonsound(tracker) sucks!!!
heheh.
(I really think so!)
Nope... we are looking for people who are willing to make some music(s) for
scc.
Interested??!! please mail!!

Mzl
Chaos^TwZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: Yamaha SFG-05

2000-06-29 Thread Tristan

 I have a few questions: I've read in the article on Alex his page that you
 need a extra cartridge to be able to access the fm module  through it's
 build in MIDI ports, it's called the 'YRM-502 FM Voicing Program II'
 cartridge.
 
 Does someone has such a cartridge?
 Do I really need one?
 Has anyone got the keyboard that works with the module?
 How do I get sound out of it? Lot's of options in the menu's but I don't
 have the manual of this cartridge. Is someone willing to scan his manual?
 ;-)

Sander,

I think you don't need a voicing program cartridge. The midi playback 
is always enabled, at least with my CX5M which has an SFG-05 plugged 
in.

I have the FM Voicing program (I), FM Music composer, FM Music macro 
cartridges of which I can make images if you would like to have them.


Tristan 

+ Omega + join #msx on undernet +[EMAIL PROTECTED] +
|   |  FUNET MSX maintainer |   ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/msx   |
+ irc: OmegaMSX +Techno composer+ http://users.bart.nl/~omegamsx +


MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet




Re: games

2000-06-29 Thread Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha


   Ah, yes, nice... But I think my RS-232 isnĀ“t very good, it hangs my MSX
 when I try run the fossil-driver...

Erix Fossil driver doesn't work with Gradiente CT-80 NET RS232
Interface or with ASCII RS232 Interface.


Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha   ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Engenharia de Computacao - UNICAMP   
http://www.adrpage.cjb.net   http://if.you.dont.like.msx.usuck.com

* void phd (long time) {while (!EOF_thesis) {hairlength++; CDs++; etc()}} *



MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
 The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
 The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
 The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet