>Yes, those figures can be 'recommended' values, but on the other hand
>a user may select another possible sector/cluster value.
Well, really it is worth to let the user to worry about this?
-
Konami Man - AKA N
] >Yes, those figures can be 'recommended' values, but on the other hand
] >a user may select another possible sector/cluster value.
]
] Well, really it is worth to let the user to worry about this?
Yes, I do think so. The user should always have the option to choose
something different then the
Some time ago I find in the Micro$oft page the following information about
how to determine the cluster size, based on the disk size:
Disk size FAT typeSectors per cluster
- ---
0 - 15M 12 bit 8
16M - 127M 16 bit
Nestor Soriano wrote:
>
> >> And now, please never start a discussion about "how to determine cluster
> >> size when using FAT16"! No needing for this!! ;-)
> >Microsoft is again trying to simplify simple, as usual...
> >The easiest way of determining cluster size is to look into
> >boot sector a
>> And now, please never start a discussion about "how to determine cluster
>> size when using FAT16"! No needing for this!! ;-)
>Microsoft is again trying to simplify simple, as usual...
>The easiest way of determining cluster size is to look into
>boot sector at the BPB parametre Sectors per Clu
Nestor Soriano wrote:
>
> Some time ago I find in the Micro$oft page the following information about
> how to determine the cluster size, based on the disk size:
>
> Disk size FAT typeSectors per cluster
> - ---
>
> 0 - 15M 12 bit
