Laurens Holst wrote:
Laurens Holst wrote:
oh yeah, btw.. it's loser, not luser.. (didn't have no
education eh??)
Jeez! English is terrible on this list!
People, it is LOOSERS and LAMERS. Not losers not lusers nor lammers.
Yeah, yeah, the lamer part I understand, butteh, it's
hiya...
Laurens Holst wrote:
oh yeah, btw.. it's loser, not luser.. (didn't have no
education eh??)
Jeez! English is terrible on this list!
People, it is LOOSERS and LAMERS. Not losers not lusers nor lammers.
Yeah, yeah, the lamer part I understand, butteh, it's
loser, and not looser,
Laurens Holst wrote:
oh yeah, btw.. it's loser, not luser.. (didn't have no
education eh??)
Jeez! English is terrible on this list!
People, it is LOOSERS and LAMERS. Not losers not lusers nor lammers.
Yeah, yeah, the lamer part I understand, butteh, it's
loser, and not looser, because