> Hello Egor (and all readers in the mailinglist!)
>
> I found out that not every participant is using the MSX-rating in the right
> way.
>
> For Example: I found twice the MSX-rating on one HomePage, so if there's
> only ONE (1) HIT, the counter will get TWO (2)... So your site is always on
> t
] > Hello Egor (and all readers in the mailinglist!)
] >
] > I found out that not every participant is using the MSX-rating in the right
] > way.
] >
] > For Example: I found twice the MSX-rating on one HomePage, so if there's
] > only ONE (1) HIT, the counter will get TWO (2)... So your site is
t Wiskunde/Informatica
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 1998 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No competition!
Hi,
> Is there something we can do about this MIS-USE!?
Egor (actually, anyone) can quickly check it. You can go the the page that
needs to be checked once, and then the coun
> > Hello Egor (and all readers in the mailinglist!)
> >
There's more to say about MSX Rating. For The Ultimate MSX FAQ (and also my
other pages) I also have a NedStat Counter, which should work in the same way
as MSX Rating. But I always have more hits on the NedStat Counter in
comparison wi
Hello Egor (and all readers in the mailinglist!)
I found out that not every participant is using the MSX-rating in the right
way.
For Example: I found twice the MSX-rating on one HomePage, so if there's
only ONE (1) HIT, the counter will get TWO (2)... So your site is always on
top!
This way, t
Hi,
> Is there something we can do about this MIS-USE!?
Egor (actually, anyone) can quickly check it. You can go the the page that
needs to be checked once, and then the counter on Egor's page *should* have
increased by one, and only one! Unfortunately, I can't check this hypothesis
now because
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
> > > Hello Egor (and all readers in the mailinglist!)
> > >
>
> There's more to say about MSX Rating. For The Ultimate MSX FAQ (and also my
> other pages) I also have a NedStat Counter, which should work in the same way
> as MSX Rating. But I always have more hits on the