Hello all,
Coming back to Andy's questions:
1. Can papers on EBMT succeed in getting published (especially in
non-expert, i.e. MT-specific, conferences) without making direct
comparisons to SMT?
Certainly one giant step in this direction would be made if people doing
SMT of the
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your post to the list.
A few comments:
I think this is my main concern: SMT is very well (and deservedly so)
established nowadays as the main way to do MT. Unless you're an MT
person, you'd think that it was the _only_ way to do MT, as here.
I would say:
1. Can SMT
