On Apr 22, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
Gathering the info from any given might be a little difficult -- we'd
have to enlist orte somehow. The orteds could conceivably be able to
get this info because the MPI processes are their children, after
all. The orteds would then need to gath
On Tue, Apr/22/2008 03:19:35PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> Gathering the info from any given might be a little difficult -- we'd
> have to enlist orte somehow. The orteds could conceivably be able to
> get this info because the MPI processes are their children, after
> all. The orteds would then
Gathering the info from any given might be a little difficult -- we'd
have to enlist orte somehow. The orteds could conceivably be able to
get this info because the MPI processes are their children, after
all. The orteds would then need to gather this info and make it
available somehow (e
I was thinking for very test as an extra bit or two of information.
But we could try a test suite too, but we would have to think about
what we would want to exercise in it.
-josh
On Apr 22, 2008, at 1:45 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
On Tue, Apr/22/2008 01:35:06PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
On the O
On Tue, Apr/22/2008 01:35:06PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> On the Open MPI teleconf this morning Rich mentioned that
> he was noticing odd memory usage. It got me thinking,
> would it be useful for MTT to track important aspects of
> the process such as memory use?
>
> Just a thought. I'm not exactly su
