On Oct 17, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
Either or both of those would be fine (don't we have a timeout in
DoCommand.pm already?).
There is a timeout in DoCommand, but currently I keep
reinvoking DoCommand on each "interrupted system call" so
the timeout gets reset each time. This
On Wed, Oct/17/2007 07:45:53AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
>
> >>> The bail is that "make" will eventually succeed or fail
> >>> with something other than "interrupted system call". Do
> >>> we need another condition?
> >>
> >> I'm just worried that