Good point. No, there is no reason to use PMB 2.2. It's older and
has known bugs.
I always use IMB 2.3.
On May 21, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
Just a guess, but could this could be the source of confusion?
https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi-tests/trunk/PMB-2.2
https://svn.open-
Just a guess, but could this could be the source of confusion?
https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi-tests/trunk/PMB-2.2
https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi-tests/trunk/IMB_2.3
Should PMB be removed from ompi-tests? I mean, would there
ever be a reason to use PMB 2.2 instead of IMB 2.3?
-Ethan
On Mo
It looks like your makefile is hard-coded to use /bin/mpicc, which
will always be wrong for MTT. This specifies an absolute location
for mpicc, and does not allow the $PATH to be used.
Where are you getting your copy of IMB from?
The IMB 2.3 that is in the ompi_tests repository has a make_o
Hello again Mr Squyres.
I am most greatfull for your answers to my questions (2).
Actualy, they are both linked to the same issue: my mtt run fails in the
test build phase for IMB-MPI1.
It seems that the make file cannot find the mpicc to compile.
It searches for it in a default path (/bin/mpicc
