Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

I’m sure we’ll need a spec file and generate an RPM for them. I may have an Intel person willing to step up and help us do this - should know soon. > On Dec 10, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote: > > +1 too > > Ralph, just to be clear ... > from a mtt point of

Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

+1 too Ralph, just to be clear ... from a mtt point of view, do you expect only a release tag and a tarball ? or do you also expect a .spec file (iirc, OpenHPC is RPM based even if they use their own .spec file) Cheers, Gilles On 12/10/2015 11:34 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: +1. We

Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

+1. We did do a release branch at one point (which is likely completely stale), but we've never invested any release engineering efforts into MTT to make a packaged/perfect tarball -- mainly because, at least in the beginning, MTT was just for Open MPI core developers, and we were comfortable

Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

I think that would be good. I won't have any cycles to help until after the first of the year. We started working towards a release way back when, but I think we got stuck with the license to package up the graphing library for the MTT Reporter. We could just remove that feature from the release