Re: [MTT users] Python choice

This looks like the right approach to me: write it as Python 3, but with the Python 2 backward compatibility support add-ons. Howard: let me know if this is something your intern could tackle for us. > On May 12, 2016, at 5:06 AM, Howard Pritchard wrote: > > Hi Folks, >

Re: [MTT users] Python choice

Good question - I'm not sure we can. What happens right now is you get syntax errors during the compile. I'll have to play and see if we can generate an error message before we hit that point. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > Is it possible to

Re: [MTT users] Python choice

Is it possible to give a friendly error message at run time if you accidentally run with Python 3.x? > On May 9, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > > Hi folks > > As we look at the Python client, there is an issue with the supported Python > version. There was a

[MTT users] Python choice

Hi folks As we look at the Python client, there is an issue with the supported Python version. There was a significant break in the user-level API between Python 2.x and Python 3. Some of the issues are described here: https://docs.python.org/2/glossary.html#term-2to3 Noah and I have chatted