[MTT users] Python client requires MTT_HOME
Hello all During the telecon today, we decided to enforce a requirement in the Python client that MTT_HOME be set in the environment to point at the top of the MTT directory tree. This significantly simplified some code and seemed a reasonable minimum requirement for operation. The commit for this went in tonight, so please be sure to update your environment if using the Python client. The Perl client is not affected. Ralph ___ mtt-users mailing list mtt-users@lists.open-mpi.org https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/mtt-users
Re: [MTT users] Python client
+1 on both Ralph and Josh's comments. > On Dec 13, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Josh Hurseywrote: > > I think this is fine. If we do start to organize ourselves for a formal > release then we might want to move to pull requests to keep the branch stable > for a bit, but for now this is ok with me. > > The Python client looks like it will be a nice addition. Hopefully, I will > have the REST submission interface finished in the next couple months and > that will make it easier to submit to the DB. I probably won't get cycles to > finish that work until after Jan 12. I plan to have it done before the end of > Jan - let me know if you need it before then. > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Hey folks > > I'm working on the Python client and it is coming along pretty well. The code > is completely separate from the Perl-based client and doesn't interact with > it, so I would like to push it into the repo on an on-going basis so others > can look at it and comment as I go rather than hold it until it is "complete". > > Any objections? Obviously, it won't be fully functional at times - mostly > available for architectural review and directional suggestions. > > Ralph > > > ___ > mtt-users mailing list > mtt-us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0834.php > > > > -- > Joshua Hursey > Assistant Professor of Computer Science > University of Wisconsin-La Crosse > http://cs.uwlax.edu/~jjhursey > ___ > mtt-users mailing list > mtt-us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0837.php -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
Re: [MTT users] Python client
I think this is fine. If we do start to organize ourselves for a formal release then we might want to move to pull requests to keep the branch stable for a bit, but for now this is ok with me. The Python client looks like it will be a nice addition. Hopefully, I will have the REST submission interface finished in the next couple months and that will make it easier to submit to the DB. I probably won't get cycles to finish that work until after Jan 12. I plan to have it done before the end of Jan - let me know if you need it before then. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ralph Castainwrote: > Hey folks > > I'm working on the Python client and it is coming along pretty well. The > code is completely separate from the Perl-based client and doesn't interact > with it, so I would like to push it into the repo on an on-going basis so > others can look at it and comment as I go rather than hold it until it is > "complete". > > Any objections? Obviously, it won't be fully functional at times - mostly > available for architectural review and directional suggestions. > > Ralph > > > ___ > mtt-users mailing list > mtt-us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0834.php > -- Joshua Hursey Assistant Professor of Computer Science University of Wisconsin-La Crosse http://cs.uwlax.edu/~jjhursey
[MTT users] Python client
Hey folks I'm working on the Python client and it is coming along pretty well. The code is completely separate from the Perl-based client and doesn't interact with it, so I would like to push it into the repo on an on-going basis so others can look at it and comment as I go rather than hold it until it is "complete". Any objections? Obviously, it won't be fully functional at times - mostly available for architectural review and directional suggestions. Ralph