Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

[Josh Hursey]

I think that would be good. I won't have any cycles to help until after the
first of the year. We started working towards a release way back when, but
I think we got stuck with the license to package up the graphing library
for the MTT Reporter. We could just remove that feature from the release
since the new reporter will do something different.

Releasing where we are now should be pretty straight forward if folks just
want to posted a versioned tarball. We would have to assess how to get MTT
into a more packaged configuration (e.g., rpm) if folks want that.


On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ralph Castain  wrote:

> Hey folks
>
> There is interest in packaging MTT in the OpenHPC distribution. However,
> we don't actually have "releases" of MTT. Any objection to actually
> tagging/releasing versions?
>
> Ralph
>
>
> ___
> mtt-users mailing list
> mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
> Searchable archives:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0832.php
>



-- 
Joshua Hursey
Assistant Professor of Computer Science
University of Wisconsin-La Crosse
http://cs.uwlax.edu/~jjhursey

Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

[Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)]

+1.  We did do a release branch at one point (which is likely completely 
stale), but we've never invested any release engineering efforts into MTT to 
make a packaged/perfect tarball -- mainly because, at least in the beginning, 
MTT was just for Open MPI core developers, and we were comfortable telling them 
"get a source checkout and run from there."

If MTT is growing up to be a real package in OpenHPC, then it probably does 
need to get some release engineering lovin'.


> On Dec 10, 2015, at 4:47 AM, Josh Hursey  wrote:
> 
> I think that would be good. I won't have any cycles to help until after the 
> first of the year. We started working towards a release way back when, but I 
> think we got stuck with the license to package up the graphing library for 
> the MTT Reporter. We could just remove that feature from the release since 
> the new reporter will do something different.
> 
> Releasing where we are now should be pretty straight forward if folks just 
> want to posted a versioned tarball. We would have to assess how to get MTT 
> into a more packaged configuration (e.g., rpm) if folks want that.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ralph Castain  wrote:
> Hey folks
> 
> There is interest in packaging MTT in the OpenHPC distribution. However, we 
> don't actually have "releases" of MTT. Any objection to actually 
> tagging/releasing versions?
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> ___
> mtt-users mailing list
> mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
> Searchable archives: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0832.php
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joshua Hursey
> Assistant Professor of Computer Science
> University of Wisconsin-La Crosse
> http://cs.uwlax.edu/~jjhursey
> ___
> mtt-users mailing list
> mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0833.php


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

[Gilles Gouaillardet]

+1 too

Ralph, just to be clear ...
from a mtt point of view, do you expect only a release tag and a tarball ?
or do you also expect a .spec file
(iirc, OpenHPC is RPM based even if they use their own .spec file)

Cheers,

Gilles

On 12/10/2015 11:34 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:

+1.  We did do a release branch at one point (which is likely completely stale), but 
we've never invested any release engineering efforts into MTT to make a packaged/perfect 
tarball -- mainly because, at least in the beginning, MTT was just for Open MPI core 
developers, and we were comfortable telling them "get a source checkout and run from 
there."

If MTT is growing up to be a real package in OpenHPC, then it probably does 
need to get some release engineering lovin'.



On Dec 10, 2015, at 4:47 AM, Josh Hursey  wrote:

I think that would be good. I won't have any cycles to help until after the 
first of the year. We started working towards a release way back when, but I 
think we got stuck with the license to package up the graphing library for the 
MTT Reporter. We could just remove that feature from the release since the new 
reporter will do something different.

Releasing where we are now should be pretty straight forward if folks just want 
to posted a versioned tarball. We would have to assess how to get MTT into a 
more packaged configuration (e.g., rpm) if folks want that.


On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ralph Castain  wrote:
Hey folks

There is interest in packaging MTT in the OpenHPC distribution. However, we don't 
actually have "releases" of MTT. Any objection to actually tagging/releasing 
versions?

Ralph


___
mtt-users mailing list
mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
Searchable archives: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0832.php



--
Joshua Hursey
Assistant Professor of Computer Science
University of Wisconsin-La Crosse
http://cs.uwlax.edu/~jjhursey
___
mtt-users mailing list
mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
Link to this post: 
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0833.php

Re: [MTT users] Actual releases?

[Ralph Castain]

I’m sure we’ll need a spec file and generate an RPM for them. I may have an 
Intel person willing to step up and help us do this - should know soon.


> On Dec 10, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet  wrote:
> 
> +1 too
> 
> Ralph, just to be clear ...
> from a mtt point of view, do you expect only a release tag and a tarball ?
> or do you also expect a .spec file
> (iirc, OpenHPC is RPM based even if they use their own .spec file)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gilles
> 
> On 12/10/2015 11:34 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>> +1.  We did do a release branch at one point (which is likely completely 
>> stale), but we've never invested any release engineering efforts into MTT to 
>> make a packaged/perfect tarball -- mainly because, at least in the 
>> beginning, MTT was just for Open MPI core developers, and we were 
>> comfortable telling them "get a source checkout and run from there."
>> 
>> If MTT is growing up to be a real package in OpenHPC, then it probably does 
>> need to get some release engineering lovin'.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 10, 2015, at 4:47 AM, Josh Hursey  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think that would be good. I won't have any cycles to help until after the 
>>> first of the year. We started working towards a release way back when, but 
>>> I think we got stuck with the license to package up the graphing library 
>>> for the MTT Reporter. We could just remove that feature from the release 
>>> since the new reporter will do something different.
>>> 
>>> Releasing where we are now should be pretty straight forward if folks just 
>>> want to posted a versioned tarball. We would have to assess how to get MTT 
>>> into a more packaged configuration (e.g., rpm) if folks want that.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ralph Castain  wrote:
>>> Hey folks
>>> 
>>> There is interest in packaging MTT in the OpenHPC distribution. However, we 
>>> don't actually have "releases" of MTT. Any objection to actually 
>>> tagging/releasing versions?
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> mtt-users mailing list
>>> mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
>>> Searchable archives: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0832.php
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Joshua Hursey
>>> Assistant Professor of Computer Science
>>> University of Wisconsin-La Crosse
>>> http://cs.uwlax.edu/~jjhursey
>>> ___
>>> mtt-users mailing list
>>> mtt-us...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0833.php
>> 
> 
> ___
> mtt-users mailing list
> mtt-us...@open-mpi.org 
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mtt-users 
> 
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/mtt-users/2015/12/0835.php 
>