Re: [music-dsp] Compensate for interpolation high frequency signal loss

On 8/24/15 11:18 AM, Sampo Syreeni wrote: On 2015-08-19, Ethan Duni wrote: and it doesn't require a table of coefficients, like doing higher-order Lagrange or Hermite would. Robert I think this is where you lost me. Wasn't the premise that memory was cheap, so we can store a big prototype FIR

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] list etiquette

On 8/24/15 11:13 AM, Stefan Sullivan wrote: Well that didn't take long roflao :-) On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:08 PM Peter S > wrote: On 24/08/2015, Theo Verelst mailto:theo...@theover.org>> wrote: > I'm not going to confuse etiquette with thinki

Re: [music-dsp] Compensate for interpolation high frequency signal loss

On 2015-08-19, Ethan Duni wrote: and it doesn't require a table of coefficients, like doing higher-order Lagrange or Hermite would. Robert I think this is where you lost me. Wasn't the premise that memory was cheap, so we can store a big prototype FIR for high quality 512x oversampling? In m

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] list etiquette

Well that didn't take long On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:08 PM Peter S wrote: > On 24/08/2015, Theo Verelst wrote: > > I'm not going to confuse etiquette with thinking straight, it's clear if > > people can be respected and have some things to learn or teach, or go on > > about emotionally, that a

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] list etiquette

On 24/08/2015, Theo Verelst wrote: > I'm not going to confuse etiquette with thinking straight, it's clear if > people can be respected and have some things to learn or teach, or go on > about emotionally, that a lot of reasonable communication can take place. Note: when I tell someone that he is

Re: [music-dsp] [admin] list etiquette

I'm not going to confuse etiquette with thinking straight, it's clear if people can be respected and have some things to learn or teach, or go on about emotionally, that a lot of reasonable communication can take place. Whem a subject such as digital processing for making music is reduced to a