Re: [music-dsp] Compensate for interpolation high frequency signal loss

2015-08-26 Thread Ethan Duni
>15.6 dB + (12.04 dB) * log2( Fs/(2B) ) Oh I see, you're actually taking the details of the sinc^2 into account. What I had in mind was more of a worst-case analysis where we just call the sin() component 1 and then look at the 1/n^2 decay (which is 12dB per octave). Which we see in the second t

Re: [music-dsp] Compensate for interpolation high frequency signal loss

2015-08-26 Thread robert bristow-johnson
On 8/25/15 7:08 PM, Ethan Duni wrote: >if you can, with optimal coefficients designed with the tool of your choice, so i am ignoring any images between B and Nyquist-B, >upsample by 512x and then do linear interpolation between adjacent samples for continuous-time interpolation, you can show th

Re: [music-dsp] Compensate for interpolation high frequency signal loss

2015-08-26 Thread Ross Bencina
On 25/08/2015 5:41 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote: maybe in an ASIC or an FPGA, but in DSP code or regular-old software, i don't see the advantage of cubic or higher-order interpolation unless memory is *really* tight and you gotta lotta MIPs to burn. For discussion's sake, on Haswell you hav