Hello Andrew,
Congratulations on libsoundio. I know what's involved.
I have some feedback about the libsoundio-vs-PortAudio comparison. Most
of my comments relate to improving the accuracy and clarify of the
comparison page, but forgive me for providing a bit of commentary for
other readers
On 9/6/15 12:59 AM, Ross Bencina wrote:
On 6/09/2015 8:37 AM, Daniel Varela wrote:
sample rate is part of the audio information so any related message
( AudioSampleBuffer ) should provide it, no need to extend the
discursion.
There's more than one concept at play here:
i very much agree.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015, at 01:50 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> otherwise, you're always going to be passing sampleRate
> along with every AudioSampleBuffer.
This bit here -- this is the part that doesn't match real practice. You
would typically pass the sample rate when you construct a
Hello Andrew,
Thanks for your helpful feedback. Just to be clear: I maintain the
PortAudio core common code and some Windows host API codes. Many of the
issues that you've raised are for other platforms. In those cases I can
only respond with general comments. I will forward the specific
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015, at 11:37 PM, Daniel Varela wrote:
> Robert is right, sample rate is part of the audio information
Robert is certainly right -- an encapsulation of an audio buffer in
isolation must include the sample rate. I don't expect anyone in this
thread disagrees with that.
All the
On 06/09/15 06:59, Ross Bencina wrote:
Personally, I think AudioSampleBuffer is (a) trying to do too much
(there should be two objects: a Buffer and a BufferRef); and (b) it's
abstraction overkill for the plug-in use-case.
Speaking of the plug-in use-case. One thing that I really dislike about
This discussion is a refreshing change from some recent topics.
Constructive, respectful, not insulting. This is how it should be.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Ross Bencina wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your helpful feedback. Just to be clear: I maintain
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 2:45 AM Ross Bencina
wrote:
> On 6/09/2015 5:15 PM, Andrew Kelley wrote:
>
> PortAudio dumps a bunch of logging information to stdio without
> > explicitly turning logging on. Here's a simple program and the
> > corresponding output:
> >