Sorry I didn't get back to this thread earlier. I didn't anticipate how intense
these days are. ;)
I'm at the kemper booth #6100 most of the time. After 5pm is always a good time
to drop by.
Guess I won't be able to make it to the juce meetup unfortunately.
Cheers
Christian
> Am 19.01.2016
Hi folks,
apologies for cross posting.
We are currently looking for a DSP Engineer/Doctor to expand our
research team.
*Profile: *PhD, or engineering degree in signal processing specialized
in audio signal.
*Technical skills*
- Excellent level of: mathematic and signal processing
> On 22.01.2016|KW3, at 02:50, robert bristow-johnson
> wrote:
>
> i think i could code whatever into a sufficiently general-purpose DSP (so
> the Analog Devices "Sigma" series might be left out of that class). but i
> cannot understand what some of the
Just for clarification: In theory only one inverter with feedback is
required in order to have an instable, oscillating circuit. Practically
the technology is too quick and the amplitude will not be high enough to
define good levels. More than one of them will lead to steady states of
the
My booth #6009 is about 5 metres away from #6100, way too much for walking
unfortunately.
I’ll be there most of the afternoon and happy to meet all of you there.
> On 22 Jan 2016, at 20:54 , Christian Luther wrote:
>
> Sorry I didn't get back to this thread earlier. I
Hello folks,
I have been using rbj_eq.xls for sample rates other than 44.1k and I have
implemented the modification suggested by Robert B here :
http://www.musicdsp.org/showArchiveComment.php?ArchiveID=218
It would be great to get this back to the list.
Please could someone let me know if this