Re: [music-dsp] Sampling theory "best" explanation

Original Message Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Sampling theory "best" explanation From: "Ethan Duni" Date: Wed, September 6, 2017 4:49 pm To: "robert bristow-johnson" "A discussion

Re: [music-dsp] Sampling theory "best" explanation

Okay, no big deal. It's easy to come off the wrong way in complicated, fast moving email threads. Ethan D On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Nigel Redmon wrote: > Ethan, I wasn't taking a swipe at you, by any stretch. In fact, I wasn't > even addressing your ADC comment. It

Re: [music-dsp] Sampling theory "best" explanation

Of course I mean that we store a representation of an impulse. I've said many times that the sample values "represent" impulses. > On Sep 7, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Ethan Duni wrote: > > >For ADC, we effectively measure an instantaneous voltage and store it as an > >impulse. >

Re: [music-dsp] Sampling theory "best" explanation

Nigel Redmon wrote: >As an electrical engineer, we find great humor when people say we can't do impulses. I'm the electrical engineer who pointed out that impulses don't exist and are not found in actual ADCs. If you have some issue with anything I've posted, I'll thank you to address it to me

[music-dsp] Open Position: Chair of the School of Music @ Georgia Tech

Dear list, apologies for cross-posting. Please see below for a position as Chair of the School of Music here at Georgia Tech. Best, Alexander The Georgia Institute of Technology invites nominations and applications for the position of Chair of the School of Music in the College of Design in

Re: [music-dsp] Sampling theory "best" explanation

Ooo, I like that, better than being vague... I was implying that what constitutes a impulse depends on the context, but I like your idea. Btw, interesting that when the LTI topic with downsampling came up years ago, several people shot down the TI part, and this time the discussion has been