Nigel Redmon wrote:
(not to mention ATM--geez how many meanings can that one attain?).
thefreedictionary.com lists 106 meanings...
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/ATM
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book
Tom Wiltshire wrote:
I get DP1 and DP2 (Direct Form 1 and 2, right?) and SVF but what are the other
acronyms here? BLT? (Bacon, Lettuce, and Tomato is what comes to mind, but it doesn't seem likely...) TPT?
I suppose BLT stands for BiLinear Transform.
Peter
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp
andy butler wrote:
One thing I'm intrigued by is the notion that when downsampling it may
be possible to
remove the aliasing created by the downsampling itself
within the interpolation filter.
( so far, I don't see it's possible)
Normally, the signal is lowpass filtered before downsampling.
Richard Dobson wrote:
Well, funnily enough I think the name flangino might fit rather well
for that example! Or simply treble flanger. Is this relying on
feedback rather than wet+dry? Either way, the fundamental partial
(~75HZ) in that example is pretty much unaffected (very clear static
Alan Wolfe wrote:
i fear to post a question being the OP of this huge 100+ message thread but...
it was mentioned here and in a previous email that for digital
flangers you want to interpolate between samples for best results.
Would you want to do this for all sampling digital effects such as
