On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Eric Battenberg wrote:
What sort of email programs are people using that can't handle html?
Pine?
emacs/rmail-mode
/bin/mail
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp
links
I can see the above binary, which implies that attaching a pretty
explanatory image can be done without resorting to HTML (just not in
line). So I'll say no HTML too. (I use gmail myself, but I use it on
a text-based browser. I also occasionally use mailx to access gmail.)
What sort of email
And FWIW, maybe it's time to change that. Spam filters have gotten a lot
better in the last few years. This is an OLD list, and back in the day
attachments/HTML caused lots of problems.
What do you all think? Should we allow HTML/attachments?
best,
douglas
On 8/7/13 3:34 PM, douglas
On 8/7/13 12:35 PM, douglas repetto wrote:
And FWIW, maybe it's time to change that. Spam filters have gotten a
lot better in the last few years. This is an OLD list, and back in the
day attachments/HTML caused lots of problems.
What do you all think? Should we allow HTML/attachments?
Please no HTML mail. It displays as goobledy gook, and my fiters ignore
as it is usually spam. Attachments maybe -- easier to ignore
On 8/7/13 12:35 PM, douglas repetto wrote:
And FWIW, maybe it's time to change that. Spam filters have gotten a
lot better in the last few years. This is an
Okay, I'm hoping this one finally makes it through. Despite the fact
that I removed formatting in gmail, the message was still sent with an
html header. I looked at the raw email message and it looks like
gmail includes a plain text version in addition to the html version of
the email. Is there
On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Eric Battenberg wrote:
What sort of email programs are people using that can't handle html? Pine?
Which is /exactly/ why I use it.
do you strip binary enclosures?:
begin 644 nlnn.gif
M1TE.#=A,@``(```/___RP`,@XR/JOM#Z.M-J+L]Z\
