On Sat, Sep 5, 2015, at 01:23 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> same problem (if that *is* a problem) if you pass sampleRate alongside
> the AudioSampleBuffer rather than inside of it.
I agree, that would be the worst of both worlds. (At least from this
perspective -- there may be other
On 6/09/2015 8:37 AM, Daniel Varela wrote:
sample rate is part of the audio information so any related message
( AudioSampleBuffer ) should provide it, no need to extend the discursion.
There's more than one concept at play here:
(1) If you consider the AudioSampleBuffer as a stand-alone
