On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Julian Schmidt
julian_schm...@chipmusik.de wrote:
okay, i used exactly RBJs code with 1024 samples tablesize and I get a -60
dB spectral distortion floor.
That's again what no interpolation would give, so probably there is
a bug in the interpolation code,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Julian Schmidt
julian_schm...@chipmusik.de wrote:
okay, i used exactly RBJs code with 1024 samples tablesize and I get a -60
dB spectral distortion floor.
That's again exactly what no interpolation gives, so probably there is
a bug in the interpolation code,
Not alone, Emanuel.
Clicks, especially 2-3 seconds apart doesn't describe aliasing—and looking at
the spectral distortion seems to be a separate issue. Julian, does that still
describe the problem you're hearing, after your recent code changes?
On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Emanuel Landeholm
now that i think of it, if you're doing linear interpolation and you
forget to add that extra repeated point at the end of the wavetable:
float wavetable[257]; // one extra point for doing linear interpolation
// make sure that wavetable[256] = wavetable[0]
you will
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Nigel Redmon earle...@earlevel.com wrote:
Clicks, especially 2-3 seconds apart doesn't describe aliasing
Here are clicks created by aliasing for you to listen (loudness warning!):
Interesting Olli—though I don't hear that as clicks—maybe they match the OP's
interpretation, but not the impression I got when he said there were clicks...
On Apr 10, 2012, at 10:06 AM, Olli Niemitalo wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Nigel Redmon earle...@earlevel.com wrote:
Clicks,
Excellent point, Robert. (Another way to avoid it is to mask the index with
0xff, if you want to keep the table 256, but not check for wrap in the
mid-interpolation.)
On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:05 AM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
now that i think of it, if you're doing linear interpolation and
