Re: [music-dsp] DAFx 2012 - Software Development for Audio and Music Researchers Tutorial

2012-10-20 Thread Andy Farnell
Great to see prof Mark Plumbley talking some sense to the train wreck of the present academic trajecory in those slides. On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 05:52:09PM +0100, Luis Figueira wrote: Dear MUSIC-DSP list members, we'd like to let you know that the handouts, slides and other materials

Re: [music-dsp] DAFx 2012 - Software Development for Audio and Music Researchers Tutorial

2012-10-20 Thread Andy Farnell
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:17:29PM +0100, Victor Lazzarini wrote: What do you mean? In Mark's slides. The case for proper publication, documentation, open access and intellectual honesty. The values that most of us old beards consider to be the foundation of _real_ science. Or are you

Re: [music-dsp] DAFx 2012 - Software Development for Audio and Music Researchers Tutorial

2012-10-20 Thread Victor Lazzarini
No, sorry, I did not mean to open a can of worms. I don't disagree with Mark. In fact, that's how I have been operating ever since I got into this career. I may have missed the eclipse of those values. Most people I associate with work on that basis. Do you mean to say that there is a big

Re: [music-dsp] DAFx 2012 - Software Development for Audio and Music Researchers Tutorial

2012-10-20 Thread robert bristow-johnson
On 10/20/12 10:30 AM, Andy Farnell wrote: Great to see prof Mark Plumbley talking some sense to the train wreck of the present academic trajecory in those slides. On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 04:17:29PM +0100, Victor Lazzarini wrote: What do you mean? On 10/20/12 1:29 PM, Andy Farnell wrote: