Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread robert bristow-johnson
On 2/11/13 2:47 PM, Johannes Kroll wrote: On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:00 -0500 robert bristow-johnson wrote: On 2/11/13 11:43 AM, Johannes Kroll wrote: On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:28:17 -0500 robert bristow-johnson wrote: On 2/10/13 12:13 PM, Johannes Kroll wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:23:54 -

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread Johannes Kroll
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:47:14 +0100 Johannes Kroll wrote: > Where XPwet is the dry/wet ratio, 0 is completely filtered and 1 is > completely unfiltered (the original signal). Sorry, I meant: 0.0 is completely unfiltered (dry) and 1.0 is completely filtered (wet). I should go to sleep early today

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread Johannes Kroll
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:52:00 -0500 robert bristow-johnson wrote: > On 2/11/13 11:43 AM, Johannes Kroll wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:28:17 -0500 > > robert bristow-johnson wrote: > > > >> On 2/10/13 12:13 PM, Johannes Kroll wrote: > >>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:23:54 -0800 > >>> Bram de Jong

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP? SVF

2013-02-11 Thread andy butler
Wouldn't the obvious thing to try first be a state variable filter? Taking the Lo-pass, Band-pass and Hi-Pass outputs. Then the parameter would in the first half of it's range crossfade from LP to BP, and in the second half from BP to HP. I can confirm that mixing the outputs from an SVF so

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread Wen Xue
I think in his "serial" LP-HP topology you're meant to use your parameter to control the cut-off frequencies, not the gains. It makes possible to have the filter be either LP, BP or HP at ANY time. If you use parallel LP-BP-HP and tune the gains, it's very likely that at some point the filter's

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread robert bristow-johnson
On 2/11/13 11:43 AM, Johannes Kroll wrote: On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:28:17 -0500 robert bristow-johnson wrote: On 2/10/13 12:13 PM, Johannes Kroll wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:23:54 -0800 Bram de Jong wrote: does anyone know of a filter design that can smoothly be changed from LP to BP to HP

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread Johannes Kroll
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:43:05 +0100 Johannes Kroll wrote: > And to get a BP you would have to chain LP+BP in series, not in s/BP/HP > parallel, no? ... Perhaps I misunderstood what Bram wants to do. > -- dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and webs

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread Johannes Kroll
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:28:17 -0500 robert bristow-johnson wrote: > On 2/10/13 12:13 PM, Johannes Kroll wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:23:54 -0800 > > Bram de Jong wrote: > >> does anyone know of a filter design that can smoothly be changed from > >> LP to BP to HP with a parameter? IIRC LP/AP

Re: [music-dsp] filter smoothly changeable from LP<->BP<->HP?

2013-02-11 Thread robert bristow-johnson
On 2/10/13 12:13 PM, Johannes Kroll wrote: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 03:23:54 -0800 Bram de Jong wrote: does anyone know of a filter design that can smoothly be changed from LP to BP to HP with a parameter? IIRC LP/AP/HP could be done simply by perfect reconstruction LP/HP filter pairs, but never see