it still sound wrong added to
the music?”). Care to comment?
On Feb 8, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Vicki Melchior vmelch...@earthlink.net wrote:
I have no argument at all with the cheap high-pass TPDF dither; whenever it
was published the original authors undoubtedly verified that the moment
with microphones
or noise in air, this is in the near perfect case of transmission via
a well shielded differential cable transferring the voltage directly
to the ADC.
All the best,
Andy
-- cytomic -- sound music software --
On 9 February 2015 at 00:09, Vicki Melchior vmelch...@earthlink.net
bristow-johnson wrote:
On 2/7/15 8:54 AM, Vicki Melchior wrote:
Well, the point of dither is to reduce correlation between the signal and
quantization noise. Its effectiveness requires that the error signal has
given properties; the mean error should be zero and the RMS error should
:
Original Message
Subject: Re: [music-dsp] Dither video and articles
From: Vicki Melchior vmelch...@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, February 6, 2015 2:23 pm
To: A discussion list for music-related DSP music-dsp
needs to be rethought.
Vicki Melchior
(graph mentioned is fig 8 in this paper:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17501)
On Feb 6, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Nigel Redmon wrote:
First, if there is enough noise in the signal before truncation, then it’s
dithered by default—no correlation
it is
likely to depend both on how extensive your data flow pathway is and how good
your playback equipment is.
Vicki Melchior
On Feb 5, 2015, at 10:01 PM, Ross Bencina wrote:
On 6/02/2015 1:50 PM, Tom Duffy wrote:
The AES report is highly controversial.
Plenty of sources dispute the findings
