On 25 June 2014 07:27, Ethan Duni ethan.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Ethan: This seems kind of pedantic. It's still an iterative solution to the
underlying model. You've just offloaded the iterations to happen before
runtime, and then added another layer of approximation at runtime to
interpolate the
I'm not new to the practical ( e.g. http://www.theover.org/Synth ) or
theoretical ( undergrad courses EE univ. like Network Theory,
Information Theory, Circuits and Systems, etc. ), but I didn't read up
on every detail I might have forgot from the 80s. I was thinking about
the generalities (
You're right.
I've been worked up ever since people post those silly and ignorant stabs like
this:
On 09.04.2014, at 19:12, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
if there is feedback, there must be at least one sample of delay, despite
claims of zero-delay feedback i have
On 24 Jun 2014, at 17:37 , robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
On 6/24/14 6:00 AM, Urs Heckmann wrote:
You're right.
I've been worked up ever since people post those silly and ignorant stabs
like this:
On 09.04.2014, at 19:12, robert
On Tue, June 24, 2014 9:53 pm, Stefan Stenzel wrote:
On 09.04.2014, at 19:12, robert
bristow-johnsonr...@audioimagination.com wrote:
if there is feedback, there must be at least one sample of delay,
despite claims of zero-delay feedback i have read here on music-dsp
and at other places.
On 6/24/14 4:53 PM, Bogac Topaktas wrote:
On Tue, June 24, 2014 9:53 pm, Stefan Stenzel wrote:
On 09.04.2014, at 19:12, robert bristow-johnsonr...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
if there is feedback, there must be at least one sample of delay,
despite claims of zero-delay feedback i have read
On Wed, June 25, 2014 12:21 am, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
dunno what is meant by elaborate tricks but it just boils down to an
H(z). lotsa ways to get an H(z), and they normally come up with
different coefficients.
It means solving the problem in a topology-preserving manner. If your
Hi folks,
This is generally a friendly, tolerant list. I feel like this conversation
is getting a bit snippy, on all sides. Please consider letting it cool off
for a bit to try and reset the tone.
Let's give each other the benefit of the doubt and assume good intentions -
- we're all here to
On 6/23/14 11:37 PM, Douglas Repetto wrote:
Hi folks,
This is generally a friendly, tolerant list. I feel like this conversation
is getting a bit snippy, on all sides.
i was getting snippy, but i kept the subject about the technical.
didn't bring up anything personal about anybody. i tried
