computer DSP signal pathfor audioimprovements
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-05-02, Rob Belcham wrote:
Agreed. There is a lot more low end in the processed but the loss of
the high frequencies is distracting.
...
Well, I wanted to make clear modern mixes on consumer materials are often
On 2013-05-03, Theo Verelst wrote:
Well, I wanted to make clear modern mixes on consumer materials are
often messed up, and discuss that. If your monitoring makes all the CD
and well known blurays and such sound fine to your ears, fine.
I certainly didn't say that. Instead your ideas sound
Rob Belcham wrote:
Agreed. There is a lot more low end in the processed but the loss of the
high frequencies is distracting.
In some senses in most fragments there's more high, but not mid(-high),
because of the FFT-ed high freq components over 12 kHz. Of course the
volume is often
On 2013-05-02, Rob Belcham wrote:
Agreed. There is a lot more low end in the processed but the loss of
the high frequencies is distracting.
Agreed. Plus even the middle range sounds somewhat muddled at least to
my ears, plus dynamically poor.
Theo, I haven't been following music-dsp pretty
Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-05-02, Rob Belcham wrote:
Agreed. There is a lot more low end in the processed but the loss of
the high frequencies is distracting.
...
Well, I wanted to make clear modern mixes on consumer materials are
often messed up, and discuss that. I f your
