I think it can be done simpler. Just extend the inverse Fourier
transform in the same way how the bilateral Laplace transform extends
the direct Fourier transform. Any mistake in that reasoning?
Regards,
Vadim
On 02-Aug-14 20:10, colonel_h...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, Vadim
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Vadim Zavalishin wrote:
I think it can be done simpler. Just extend the inverse Fourier transform in
the same way how the bilateral Laplace transform extends the direct Fourier
transform. Any mistake in that reasoning?
Basically, allow t to be complex when you inverse
