Interesting topic since it became a bit of hype when computer audio processing programs
started to include "stretching" as an option.
Two main thoughts I haven't heard yet: the real time matter, which in the normal digital
domain sampling frequency ranges poses the question of the length of
Hello all
Am 22.05.2018 um 14:11 schrieb Theo Verelst:
> fundamentally limited by the length of the sinc (-like) "perfect"
> resample kernel, and the required delay for accurate re-sampling might
> be considerable!
This can be limited by an increasing sampling rate reducing the
coarsness, but
On Tue, 22 May 2018, at 18:31, Matt Ingalls wrote:
> As far as I can understand it, it seems to be along the same lines as
> that Bernsee blog, but with peak detection.
I think that should work a lot better than what you have -- although Eric
Brombaugh's experience earlier in the thread may be
On Tue, 22 May 2018, at 14:09, Sound of L.A. Music and Audio wrote:
> With the voice it is even more tricky, since the formant shaping is
> different for other frequencies. One reason is, that there are more than
> one "equalizer" involved. Just putting the whole track to a hight frequ
> will
> On May 21, 2018, at 2:08 PM, robert bristow-johnson
> wrote:
>
> unless you're gonna worry about formants, pitch shifting is just resampling
> applied to the output (or input) of a time scaler. i would do whichever
> operation increases the data first. so pitch
On Mon, 21 May 2018, at 22:08, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
> From: "Chris Cannam"
> > I assume this wouldn't work with your use-case as you want to keep the
> > frames synchronised so you can resynthesise everything in one go.
> it would need more buffering, but