On 08.11.2013, at 10:21, Vadim Zavalishin
vadim.zavalis...@native-instruments.de wrote:
Hi Urs! I don't believe this. So, you think that The art of VA filter
design book doesn't cover it?
Regards,
Vadim
Hi Vadim,
No offense meant, I wasn't aware that your book was considered a
On 09.11.2013, at 01:57, Tom Duffy tdu...@tascam.com wrote:
To paraphrase, all are good enough if the frequency
is low ( pi/3); Simpsons is the best, but blows
up above 0.8 pi
Note that Andys approach uses trapezoidal integrators just as that -
integrators. While the whole structure of the
signal processing
can chat. So I encourage you to share your results here!
I'm sorry there has been unpleasantness on the list recently.
best,
douglas
On 11/10/13 10:00 AM, Urs Heckmann wrote:
We had planned to write a paper about our numerical method for the
non-linear case
On 11.11.2013, at 01:33, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
but you cannot define your current output sample in terms of the current
output sample.
But that, with all due respect, is what has been done for quite a while. It
isn't the major ingredient of great sound,
On 11.11.2013, at 02:21, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
On 11/10/13 5:12 PM, Urs Heckmann wrote:
On 11.11.2013, at 01:33, robert bristow-johnsonr...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
but you cannot define your current output sample in terms of the current
output
On 13.11.2013, at 07:50, Andrew Simper a...@cytomic.com wrote:
I hope this clears things up and exposes ZDF as a confusing and pointless
marketing catch phrase.
It's not pointless for marketing in the sense that instantaneous feedback is
much easier to explain than implicit integration. Users
difference
methods for nonlinear ODE models of analog circuits?
Max
On 14 November 2013 11:26, Urs Heckmann u...@u-he.com wrote:
My point is,
It's not the fault of those who use the term in a correct way that some
others have used it in a confusing way.
That however doesn't justify
Well, the word delay has been used in literature for 30+ years, to explain
z^-1 sections in algorithmic implementations. I wonder what RBJ would have
called the terms z^-1 or z^-2 had he explained them in his cookbook. What would
you call them?
I agree though that one should not confuse model
On 20.06.2014, at 11:11, Tim Goetze t...@quitte.de wrote:
I
mistakenly thought you were proposing nodal analysis including also
the nonlinear aspects of the circuit including valves and output
transformer (which without being too familiar with the method I
believe to lead to a system of
On 20.06.2014, at 17:37, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
On 6/20/14 10:57 AM, Andrew Simper wrote:
On 20 June 2014 17:11, Tim Goetzet...@quitte.de wrote:
[Andrew Simper]
On 18 June 2014 21:01, Tim Goetzet...@quitte.de wrote:
I absolutely agree that this looks to
Dear Robert,
On 22.06.2014, at 04:19, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
it's possible that this is only a semantic issue.
Thanks for clearing this up. It's indeed a semantic issue (use of the term
nodal analysis), which then leads to further misunderstandings.
What we
On 22.06.2014, at 19:04, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
i don't think i agree with the following claim, Urs,
... but no matter what method of integration we use, we always end up with
the same set of equations to solve for the actual step.
different methods of
On 22.06.2014, at 20:24, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
On 6/22/14 1:20 PM, Urs Heckmann wrote:
On 22.06.2014, at 19:04, robert bristow-johnsonr...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
2. Get the computer to crunch numbers by iteratively predicting,
evaluating
On 23.06.2014, at 06:37, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
the other thing Urs brought up for discussion is an iterative and recursive
process that converges on a result value, given an input. i am saying that
this can be rolled out into a non-recursive equivalent,
On 23.06.2014, at 19:18, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
it *is* precisely equivalent to the example you were describing with one more
iteration than you were saying was necessary.
Now I'm really angry I wasted so much time. An example is just that, an
example. I
On 24.06.2014, at 10:16, Stefan Stenzel stefan.sten...@waldorfmusic.de wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 0:37 , Urs Heckmann u...@u-he.com wrote:
(Odyssee?) - fully analogue synths. That's currently the only way to get
something decent in hardware. Proper digital models seem to only make
You're right.
I've been worked up ever since people post those silly and ignorant stabs like
this:
On 09.04.2014, at 19:12, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
if there is feedback, there must be at least one sample of delay, despite
claims of zero-delay feedback i have
17 matches
Mail list logo
