On 13.11.2013, at 12:54, Vadim Zavalishin
vadim.zavalis...@native-instruments.de wrote:
So, after we have modelled them all, we are not gonna need any further
modelling.
;-)
At that time,we should offer real-time spice to let our dear customers tinker
with their virtual circuits. We’ll
Urs, I don't know if you're referring to music-dsp here, but this list
is specifically not meant to be in the academic realm, but rather a
place where people of all sorts with an interest in music and digital
signal processing can chat. So I encourage you to share your results here!
I'm
On 11/9/13 6:52 PM, Andrew Simper wrote:
Marco writes:
Well, of course the s = (T/2)(z-1)/(z+1) conversion comes from discretizing
a differential equation.
but remember, that's not the only way to convert s to z. that's the
bilinear way to do it.
...
What I would say more about this
On 11.11.2013, at 01:33, robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
but you cannot define your current output sample in terms of the current
output sample.
But that, with all due respect, is what has been done for quite a while. It
isn't the major ingredient of great sound,
On 11/10/13 5:12 PM, Urs Heckmann wrote:
On 11.11.2013, at 01:33, robert bristow-johnsonr...@audioimagination.com
wrote:
but you cannot define your current output sample in terms of the current output
sample.
But that, with all due respect, is what has been done for quite a while.
it's
i hope it's ok if i sum up the main themes here with background links,
as i understand it. the thread is just such a mess...
here is the state variable filter from hal chamberlin 1985 or so:
http://t.co/SVJp7iAgqb
pierre dutilleux wrote up a nice discretized and tuned version in dafx 1998:
Hi Ezra,
A few comments:
On 11/11/2013 3:19 PM, Ezra Buchla wrote:
there seems to be some concern about distortion introduced by the
trapezoidal integration. i've tried the algo in both fixed 32 ands
float, and it seems to sound and look ok to but i have not done a
proper analysis either
On 11/11/2013 12:21 PM, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
but you cannot define your current output sample in terms of the
current output sample.
But that, with all due respect, is what has been done for quite a while.
it's been reported or *reputed* to be done for quite a while.
but when the
On 9 November 2013 22:21, Marco Lo Monaco marco.lomon...@teletu.it wrote:
Hi Marco,
First up I want to thank you for your considered and useful
observations Marco, I appreciate where you are coming from and how you
can clearly communicate your ideas. This makes it possible for me to
reply to
