Re: [mb-style] Producer vs Composer and remixes in hip hop music

2010-11-22 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Per Øyvind Øygard per...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:21:14 +0530, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe some of this has been debated before, but as this mailing list is horribly annoying to search in, I'll just ask. In

Re: [mb-style] Producer vs Composer and remixes in hip hop music

2010-11-22 Thread Nikki
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: The least bad way I can see of working with all this would be having 2 different works for every standard hip hop recording. One for the vocal track and another for the beat / instrumental track, and think of the songs as if they were mashups in a way.

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Prefer Specific Relationship Types

2010-11-22 Thread Jeroen Latour
Good point, updated. I'd appreciate any other language comments. Thanks, Jeroen On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote: Your new version does not remove my previous concerns, because I didn't have any more :-) But I suggest replacing The following

Re: [mb-style] Producer vs Composer and remixes in hip hop music

2010-11-22 Thread Nikki
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: In hip hop, it is usual that the person who creates the music is credited as producer. In some electronic music records the person who creates the music is also credited as producer, while in other cases appears as writer. This wasn't a big problem before,

Re: [mb-style] Summary 2: Artist Credits for Works

2010-11-22 Thread Nikki
Another thing that I just thought of and mentioned to Paul on IRC is which artists do we link work edits to, without artist credits? I'm not sure exactly what's possible... I'll bring it up during today's dev chat. Nikki Paul C. Bryan wrote: Here is a summary of the response to round 2:

Re: [mb-style] Summary 2: Artist Credits for Works

2010-11-22 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
I don't understand your question, Nikki. Should all work edits be linked to an artist? 2010/11/22 Nikki aei...@gmail.com Another thing that I just thought of and mentioned to Paul on IRC is which artists do we link work edits to, without artist credits? I'm not sure exactly what's

Re: [mb-style] Summary 2: Artist Credits for Works

2010-11-22 Thread Nikki
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: I don't understand your question, Nikki. Should all work edits be linked to an artist? I think so. If someone enters an edit to one of the works composed by Bach, surely you'd want that to show up under Bach's edits? What about if someone edits a work for a pop

Re: [mb-style] Summary 2: Artist Credits for Works

2010-11-22 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2010/11/22 Nikki aei...@gmail.com Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: I don't understand your question, Nikki. Should all work edits be linked to an artist? I think so. If someone enters an edit to one of the works composed by Bach, surely you'd want that to show up under Bach's edits? What about

Re: [mb-style] RFC: Prefer Specific Relationship Types

2010-11-22 Thread SwissChris
I preferred the first version, but I can live with this one, as long as it's clearly referenced from each individual site. A specific warning on the writer guideline about the various meanings of was written by on covers, sleeves, liners is IMO still needed, though. Chris On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at

Re: [mb-style] Updating advanced relationship style for NGS

2010-11-22 Thread Brian Schweitzer
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote: 2010/11/20 Nikki aei...@gmail.com Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: Either we decide to keep those ARs at Track level and have them automatically replicated to works (clumsy IMO) or we get rid of those ARs at