Kuno Woudt wrote:
>
>> And BTW, if this passes RFC/RFV and some developer starts working on the
>> server support please take care of the other unsupported cover art sites
>> with permission, too.
>
> We're mostly not touching the current server, so if this needs changes
> to that code... that
On 12/11/2010 4:54 PM, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 17:42 -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>> You seem to be combining a CC license AR, a cover art AR, a can be
>> purchased for mailorder/download, and a normal "has a page at specific
>> site" AR.
>>
>>
>> The CC license AR is a bit s
On 11/12/10 22:49, meindu...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having Bandcamp at least as one of our supported cover art sites is a very
> good idea. +2 on that.
>
> However, many releases there are CC licensed. If we use a dedicated AR to
> link to the download URL we'd loose the CC type informat
>
> Agreed on the CC AR point. And again, that's what this proposal has become.
> Bandcamp offers all of the listed services to users. Media, streaming,
> purchase/downloading, and even physical goods sales. That's the chief reason
> why this should be a dedicated "Artist X has a bandcamp page at
>
First off, let me apologize for any bizarre formatting that takes place.
I've been using Sparrow (Desktop Mail App) lately, and it seems to have some
kinks to work out still, so I switched to the web interface mid stride. I
don't even want to know why the mailman archives page shows my first post
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 17:42 -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> You seem to be combining a CC license AR, a cover art AR, a can be
> purchased for mailorder/download, and a normal "has a page at specific
> site" AR.
>
>
> The CC license AR is a bit specialized; CC is not just an attribute
> that can
I've not heard of the site before, but have no objections to the AR itself.
However, as has already been mentioned by others, there's problems here
which would block my being able to support the RFC in its current state.
You seem to be combining a CC license AR, a cover art AR, a can be purchased
are of the other unsupported cover art sites with
permission, too.
Cheers,
Christian (MD)
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:46:55 +0100
> Von: "Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren"
> An: MusicBrainz Style Discussion
> Betreff: Re: [mb-style] RFC-298: Has
Jason wrote:
> I've been in contact with Ethan, an individual who runs Bandcamp (1 of 6 on
> staff, apparently), and he's starting to talk technical details, so it sounds
> like they're willing to provide permission to be used as a CoverArt source.
I don't know what you've said so far, but it wo
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Calvin Walton wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 16:09 +0100, Aurélien Mino wrote:
> > On 11/12/2010 10:18, Jason wrote:
> > > And lastly, I propose this Comment period runs for 1 week starting
> > > 12:01 Saturday (you pick the time zone :) ).
> >
> > What you're prop
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 16:09 +0100, Aurélien Mino wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 10:18, Jason wrote:
> > And lastly, I propose this Comment period runs for 1 week starting
> > 12:01 Saturday (you pick the time zone :) ).
>
> What you're proposing is not clear at all.
>
> Judging from this mail and the RF
On 11/12/2010 10:18, Jason wrote:
> And lastly, I propose this Comment period runs for 1 week starting
> 12:01 Saturday (you pick the time zone :) ).
What you're proposing is not clear at all.
Judging from this mail and the RFC title, I think what you want is
adding BandCamp to the white-list o
I've been in contact with Ethan, an individual who runs Bandcamp (1 of 6 on
staff, apparently), and he's starting to talk technical details, so it sounds
like they're willing to provide permission to be used as a CoverArt source.
I've written up the initial details of the proposal in
http://wi
13 matches
Mail list logo
