Re: [mb-style] RFC-316: Add spoken to the vocal tree

2011-01-25 Thread Nikki
+1 from me too, spoken stuff is the main reason I need to use other for vocals. and since you didn't include it, this proposal expires on the 30th (around 2am CET, so still the 29th for a lot of people ;)) Nikki Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: I would like to propose adding a spoken

Re: [mb-style] RFC-316: Add spoken to the vocal tree

2011-01-25 Thread Grant Swanjord
Would this include narrator attributions? -- Grant On Jan 25, 2011 1:16 PM, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me too, spoken stuff is the main reason I need to use other for vocals. and since you didn't include it, this proposal expires on the 30th (around 2am CET, so still the 29th for

Re: [mb-style] RFC-316: Add spoken to the vocal tree

2011-01-25 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Grant Swanjord grant.swanj...@gmail.com wrote: Would this include narrator attributions? I would include them as spoken, but I don't work on audiobooks. If you think a separate narrator attribute is needed, feel free to suggest it as a sub-type of spoken. I think

[mb-style] RFC-316: Add spoken to the vocal tree

2011-01-22 Thread Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
I would like to propose adding a spoken attribute to the vocal tree. The separate Speaker Relationship Type (RFC-55) is abandoned, and honestly, I'd say there is no reason to consider speech as different from the rest of the vocal tree. speech is a part of the advanced vocal tree pre-proposal (

Re: [mb-style] RFC-316: Add spoken to the vocal tree

2011-01-22 Thread SwissChris
+1 2011/1/23 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com I would like to propose adding a spoken attribute to the vocal tree. The separate Speaker Relationship Type (RFC-55) is abandoned, and honestly, I'd say there is no reason to consider speech as different from the rest of the vocal