Hi guys,
I have a maildir with several folders + fetchmail running in background
and mutt with the sidebar supprt. When I'm reading email in mutt sidebar
is not getting updated, but gets up-to-date seconds after I close the
email. Is this a known issue?
On 12:20 Wed 03 Aug, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 01:12PM +0300 Consus (con...@gmx.com) muttered:
> > mutt with the sidebar supprt. When I'm reading email in mutt sidebar
> > is not getting updated, but gets up-to-date seconds after I close the
On 16:16 Mon 08 Aug, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2016-08-08 08:25:14 -, Mutt wrote:
> > Here's a real-life example of how metadata version leaks like these are
> > actually used in practice to help identify people:
>
> This is pointless here. The "From:" header already identifies the user.
On 13:40 Fri 18 Nov, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> In compress.c:
>
> mutt_error (_(" %s: Error compressing mailbox! Uncompressed one
> kept!\n"), ctx->path);
>
> Is the space before the %s there on purpose?
>
> It is the only mutt_error instance for which the message starts
> with a space.
>
# HG changeset patch
# User Consus
# Date 1496432648 -10800
# Fri Jun 02 22:44:08 2017 +0300
# Node ID b7b5f63aa25bc1ff44e43e19946f76422180c966
# Parent f26adb2b05438976cacc306ef4e4884e87e1cf5e
Rename 'sign as' to 'Sign as'; makes compose menu more consistent.
dif
On 14:46 Fri 02 Jun, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Thanks for the patch! Normally I don't touch the .po files, but in this
> case I understand why you did.
>
> The change makes sense to me, but sometimes it's the tiniest things that
> cause the most controversy. So I'm going to give this a couple d
Hi,
I just realized that address queries via header cache would be a very
nice feature to have. I haven't got to the code deep enough yet, but I
think (an assumption based on quick lurking through hcache.c) that it
would be relatively easy to implement.
If I'd manage to come up with a decent patc
Hi,
I have mutt connected to IMAPS server that hangs after waking up from
hibernation. It seems that mutt is stuck on read:
$ strace -fp $(pgrep mutt)
strace: Process 25074 attached
read(3,
$ ls -l /proc/25074/fd
total 0
lrwx-- 1 consus
On 21:00 Sat 11 Aug, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I've just pushed CONDSTORE and (experimental) QRESYNC IMAP support into
> master.
>
> If you run against an IMAP server that supports QRESYNC, I would
> greatly appreciate help testing.
>
> (Note that Gmail doesn't seem to benefit from either of the
On 08:40 Sun 12 Aug, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 12:08:34PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 21:00 Sat 11 Aug, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > > I've just pushed CONDSTORE and (experimental) QRESYNC IMAP support into
> > > master.
> > >
>
Hi,
Perhaps it's time to roll out another release? New IMAP features should
benefit a lot of people.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 06:07:18PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I thought I'd send an email to the list, since it's been pretty quiet for a
> while.
>
> Recently, I've been playing around with background editing. This is still
> in the early stages, and is very much "work i
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:31:23AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 04:40:13PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > God bless you, works perfectly. Is it possible to add new statusline
> > format like "number of finished, yet not sent emails"? Sometimes I get
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 12:14:47PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:44:02PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 09:31:23AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > > I can easily add an expando for the total number of background
> >
Hi,
It seems like attachments counter (%X) is broken, at least in
pager_format. It always expands to 0, no matter how many attached files
there is.
gt; > (perhaps compiled in, or at least part of the system Muttrc), and
> > optionally, users could override those if they found it necessary.
>
> It does look like the default system Muttrc file contains some attachments
> defaults. Perhaps the packager supplied their own Muttrc
Hi,
Have you considered ability to limit mailboxes that "beep" on new mail?
Say, I have a bunch of IMAP mailboxes:
=[account]/Inbox
=[account]/Sent
=[account]/Lists/Mutt-Devel
=[account]/Lists/Whatever-Else1
=[account]/Lists/Whatever-Else2
=[account
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:55:32PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:43:54PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Have you considered ability to limit mailboxes that "beep" on new mail?
> > Say, I have a bunch of IMAP mailboxes:
>
&g
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:59:01PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote:
> > The Message-ID that mutt generates is supposed to be unique. Up till now
> > mutt would generate this ID based on the current date and time, followed by
> > ".G". foll
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:17:11PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:10:47PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:59:01PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:24:22PM -0400, Remco Rijnders wrote:
> > > > The
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:33:47PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 08:27:55PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > > > Nope, hostname it is, even if you're using built-in smtp.
> > >
> > > False. Try it.
> >
> > Check my headers :)
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 07:02:56AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 04:05:30AM +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 18:02:59 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > > I'm pleased to announce the release of version 1.14.0.
> >
> > Thank you, great job!
>
>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:16:45AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 07:27:48PM +0300, con...@ftml.net wrote:
> > For some reason I feel that db operations are faster now. Any
> > improvements or just that "new-shiny-release" effect?
>
> If you are using IMAP, then yes. Al
Hi,
I have some questions about the intended new_mail_command behavior. Two
things are weird to me:
1. It's called only if there is no new mail already in the mailbox.
2. Format options are expanded with regards to the currently opened
mailbox, not the mailbox that received mail.
Is t
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 03:44:56PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> So, yes, $new_mail_command, is pretty limited - basically an external
> command firing of $beep_new. But the patch (from Yoshiki) was also very
> simple. I don't think there's much desire to add complexity to support more
> soph
25 matches
Mail list logo
